[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a2d9a0f2-afc1-42dc-81ab-6ad0f49f5601@leica-geosystems.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:21:40 +0000
From: POPESCU Catalin <catalin.popescu@...ca-geosystems.com>
To: Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@....com>, Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
CC: Amitkumar Karwar <amitkumar.karwar@....com>, Neeraj Sanjay Kale
<neeraj.sanjaykale@....com>, "marcel@...tmann.org" <marcel@...tmann.org>,
"luiz.dentz@...il.com" <luiz.dentz@...il.com>, "robh@...nel.org"
<robh@...nel.org>, "krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>, "p.zabel@...gutronix.de"
<p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, "linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, GEO-CHHER-bsp-development
<bsp-development.geo@...ca-geosystems.com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: net: bluetooth: nxp: add support for
supply and reset
On 22/10/2024 10:09, Sherry Sun wrote:
> [收到此邮件的某些人通常不会收到来自 sherry.sun@....com 的电子邮件。请访问 https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification,以了解为什么这一点很重要。]
>
> This email is not from Hexagon’s Office 365 instance. Please be careful while clicking links, opening attachments, or replying to this email.
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2024 3:23 PM
>> To: Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@....com>
>> Cc: POPESCU Catalin <catalin.popescu@...ca-geosystems.com>; Amitkumar
>> Karwar <amitkumar.karwar@....com>; Neeraj Sanjay Kale
>> <neeraj.sanjaykale@....com>; marcel@...tmann.org;
>> luiz.dentz@...il.com; robh@...nel.org; krzk+dt@...nel.org;
>> conor+dt@...nel.org; p.zabel@...gutronix.de; linux-
>> bluetooth@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-
>> kernel@...r.kernel.org; GEO-CHHER-bsp-development <bsp-
>> development.geo@...ca-geosystems.com>; Krzysztof Kozlowski
>> <krzk@...nel.org>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: net: bluetooth: nxp: add support for
>> supply and reset
>>
>> On 24-10-22, Sherry Sun wrote:
>>>> On 24-10-21, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 21/10/2024 08:41, Marco Felsch wrote:
>>>>>> On 24-10-07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>>> On 07/10/2024 14:58, POPESCU Catalin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> + vcc-supply:
>>>>>>>>>>> + description:
>>>>>>>>>>> + phandle of the regulator that provides the supply voltage.
>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>> + reset-gpios:
>>>>>>>>>>> + description:
>>>>>>>>>>> + Chip powerdown/reset signal (PDn).
>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Catalin,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> For NXP WIFI/BT chip, WIFI and BT share the one PDn pin,
>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>> means that both wifi and BT controller will be powered on and off at
>>>> the same time.
>>>>>>>>>> Taking the M.2 NXP WIFI/BT module as an example,
>>>> pin56(W_DISABLE1) is connected to the WIFI/BT chip PDn pin, we has
>>>> already controlled this pin in the corresponding PCIe/SDIO controller dts
>> nodes.
>>>>>>>>>> It is not clear to me what exactly pins for vcc-supply and
>>>>>>>>>> reset-gpios
>>>> you describing here. Can you help understand the corresponding pins
>>>> on M.2 interface as an example? Thanks.
>>>>>>>> Hi Sherry,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regulators and reset controls being refcounted, we can then
>>>>>>>> implement powerup sequence in both bluetooth/wlan drivers and
>>>>>>>> have the drivers operate independently. This way bluetooth
>>>>>>>> driver would has no dependance on the wlan driver for :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - its power supply
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - its reset pin (PDn)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - its firmware (being downloaded as part of the combo
>>>>>>>> firmware)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For the wlan driver we use mmc power sequence to drive the
>>>>>>>> chip reset pin and there's another patchset that adds support
>>>>>>>> for reset control into the mmc pwrseq simple driver.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please wrap your replies.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It seems you need power sequencing just like Bartosz did for
>>>> Qualcomm WCN.
>>>>>>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm not familiar with power sequencing, but looks like way
>>>>>>>> more complicated than reset controls. So, why power sequencing
>>>>>>>> is recommended here ? Is it b/c a supply is involved ?
>>>>>>> Based on earlier message:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "For NXP WIFI/BT chip, WIFI and BT share the one PDn pin, which
>>>>>>> means that both wifi and BT controller will be powered on and
>>>>>>> off at the same time."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> but maybe that's not needed. No clue, I don't know the hardware.
>>>>>>> But be carefully what you write in the bindings, because then
>>>>>>> it will be
>>>> ABI.
>>>>>> We noticed the new power-sequencing infrastructure which is part
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> 6.11 too but I don't think that this patch is wrong. The DT ABI
>>>>>> won't break if we switch to the power-sequencing later on since
>>>>>> the
>>>> "reset-gpios"
>>>>>> are not marked as required. So it is up to the driver to handle
>>>>>> it either via a separate power-sequence driver or via "power-supply"
>>>>>> and "reset-gpios" directly.
>>>>> That's not the point. We expect correct hardware description. If
>>>>> you say now it has "reset-gpios" but later say "actually no,
>>>>> because it has PMU", I respond: no. Describe the hardware, not current
>> Linux.
>>>> I know that DT abstracts the HW. That said I don't see the problem
>>>> with this patch. The HW is abstracted just fine:
>>>>
>>>> shared PDn -> reset-gpios
>>>> shared power-supply -> vcc-supply
>>> Actually we should use vcc-supply to control the PDn pin, this is the
>>> power supply for NXP wifi/BT.
>> Please don't since this is regular pin on the wlan/bt device not the regulator.
>> People often do that for GPIOs if the driver is missing the support to pull the
>> reset/pdn/enable gpio but the enable-gpio on the regulator is to enable the
>> regulator and _not_ the bt/wlan device.
>>
>> Therefore the implementation Catalin provided is the correct one.
>>
> For NXP wifi/BT, the PDn is the only power control pin, no specific regulator, per my understanding,
> it is a common way to configure this pin as the vcc-supply for the wifi interface(SDIO or PCIe).
>
> reg_usdhc3_vmmc: regulator-usdhc3 {
> compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> regulator-name = "WLAN_EN";
> regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
> regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
> gpio = <&pcal6524 20 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> enable-active-high;
> };
>
> &usdhc3 {
> ...
> vmmc-supply = <®_usdhc3_vmmc>;
> ...
> }
>
> Best Regards
> Sherry
Hi Sherry,
I'm sorry but I have to disagree. I checked again block diagrams for
IW611, IW612, IW416 which are available on NXP website and they clearly
differentiate between power supply(s) and power-down. Power-down is
actually a reset and should be treated as such in the DT, not as a
supply regulator.
BR,
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists