[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdLuxL4tqodoiWE_Pq7VjwxVLa-mXnnnOT-j8W=3jetCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 12:18:17 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: string_helpers: fix potential snprintf() output truncation
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 10:30 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 9:15 AM Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 21. 10. 24, 12:04, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> > >
> > > The output of ".%03u" with the unsigned int in range [0, 4294966295] may
> > > get truncated if the target buffer is not 12 bytes.
> >
> > Perhaps, if you elaborate on how 'remainder' can become > 999?
>
> Yeah, I guess it can't. Not sure what we do about such false
> positives, do we have some common way to suppress them?
I already pointed out these kinds of warnings from GCC.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/Zt73a3t8Y8uH5MHG@smile.fi.intel.com/
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists