| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <af9bf6e1-f6fa-4683-a3bd-82cebcce6fb8@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 12:40:16 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Mohan Prasad J <mohan.prasad@...rochip.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, andrew@...n.ch
Cc: edumazet@...gle.com, shuah@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, horms@...nel.org, brett.creeley@....com,
rosenp@...il.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, willemb@...gle.com,
petrm@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] selftests: nic_performance: Add selftest
for performance of NIC driver
On 10/16/24 23:50, Mohan Prasad J wrote:
> Add selftest case to check the send and receive throughput.
> Supported link modes between local NIC driver and partner
> are varied. Then send and receive throughput is captured
> and verified. Test uses iperf3 tool.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mohan Prasad J <mohan.prasad@...rochip.com>
> ---
> .../testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/Makefile | 1 +
> .../drivers/net/hw/nic_performance.py | 121 ++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 122 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/nic_performance.py
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/Makefile
> index 0dac40c4e..289512092 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/Makefile
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ TEST_PROGS = \
> hw_stats_l3_gre.sh \
> loopback.sh \
> nic_link_layer.py \
> + nic_performance.py \
> pp_alloc_fail.py \
> rss_ctx.py \
> #
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/nic_performance.py b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/nic_performance.py
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..152c62511
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/nic_performance.py
> @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
> +#!/usr/bin/env python3
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +#Introduction:
> +#This file has basic performance test for generic NIC drivers.
> +#The test comprises of throughput check for TCP and UDP streams.
> +#
> +#Setup:
> +#Connect the DUT PC with NIC card to partner pc back via ethernet medium of your choice(RJ45, T1)
> +#
> +# DUT PC Partner PC
> +#┌───────────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────────────┐
> +#│ │ │ │
> +#│ │ │ │
> +#│ ┌───────────┐ │ │
> +#│ │DUT NIC │ Eth │ │
> +#│ │Interface ─┼─────────────────────────┼─ any eth Interface │
> +#│ └───────────┘ │ │
> +#│ │ │ │
> +#│ │ │ │
> +#└───────────────────────┘ └──────────────────────────┘
> +#
> +#Configurations:
> +#To prevent interruptions, Add ethtool, ip to the sudoers list in remote PC and get the ssh key from remote.
> +#Required minimum ethtool version is 6.10
> +#Change the below configuration based on your hw needs.
> +# """Default values"""
> +time_delay = 8 #time taken to wait for transitions to happen, in seconds.
> +test_duration = 10 #performance test duration for the throughput check, in seconds.
> +send_throughput_threshold = 80 #percentage of send throughput required to pass the check
> +receive_throughput_threshold = 50 #percentage of receive throughput required to pass the check
Please allow the user to override this parameters with env variable
and/or with the command line.
> +
> +import time
> +import json
> +from lib.py import ksft_run, ksft_exit, ksft_pr, ksft_true
> +from lib.py import KsftFailEx, KsftSkipEx
> +from lib.py import NetDrvEpEnv
> +from lib.py import cmd
> +from lib.py import LinkConfig
> +
> +def verify_throughput(cfg, link_config) -> None:
> + protocols = ["TCP", "UDP"]
> + common_link_modes = link_config.common_link_modes
> + speeds, duplex_modes = link_config.get_speed_duplex_values(common_link_modes)
> + """Test duration in seconds"""
> + duration = test_duration
> + target_ip = cfg.remote_addr
> +
> + for protocol in protocols:
> + ksft_pr(f"{protocol} test")
> + test_type = "-u" if protocol == "UDP" else ""
> + send_throughput = []
> + receive_throughput = []
> + for idx in range(0, len(speeds)):
> + bit_rate = f"-b {speeds[idx]}M" if protocol == "UDP" else ""
Always use '-b 0'. Will work with both TCP and UDP and is usually more
efficient than forcing a specific speed.
> + if link_config.set_speed_and_duplex(speeds[idx], duplex_modes[idx]) == False:
> + raise KsftFailEx(f"Not able to set speed and duplex parameters for {cfg.ifname}")
> + time.sleep(time_delay)
> + if link_config.verify_link_up() == False:
> + raise KsftSkipEx(f"Link state of interface {cfg.ifname} is DOWN")
> + send_command=f"iperf3 {test_type} -c {target_ip} {bit_rate} -t {duration} --json"
> + receive_command=f"iperf3 {test_type} -c {target_ip} {bit_rate} -t {duration} --reverse --json"
> + send_result = cmd(send_command)
> + receive_result = cmd(receive_command)
> + if send_result.ret != 0 or receive_result.ret != 0:
> + raise KsftSkipEx("Unexpected error occurred during transmit/receive")
> +
> + send_output = send_result.stdout
> + receive_output = receive_result.stdout
> +
> + send_data = json.loads(send_output)
> + receive_data = json.loads(receive_output)
> + """Convert throughput to Mbps"""
> + send_throughput.append(round(send_data['end']['sum_sent']['bits_per_second'] / 1e6, 2))
> + receive_throughput.append(round(receive_data['end']['sum_received']['bits_per_second'] / 1e6, 2))
> +
> + ksft_pr(f"{protocol}: Send throughput: {send_throughput[idx]} Mbps, Receive throughput: {receive_throughput[idx]} Mbps")
> +
> + """Check whether throughput is not below the threshold (default values set at start)"""
> + for idx in range(0, len(speeds)):
> + send_threshold = float(speeds[idx]) * float(send_throughput_threshold / 100)
> + receive_threshold = float(speeds[idx]) * float(receive_throughput_threshold / 100)
> + ksft_true(send_throughput[idx] >= send_threshold, f"{protocol}: Send throughput is below threshold for {speeds[idx]} Mbps in {duplex_modes[idx]} duplex")
> + ksft_true(receive_throughput[idx] >= receive_threshold, f"{protocol}: Receive throughput is below threshold for {speeds[idx]} Mbps in {duplex_modes[idx]} duplex")
> +
> +def test_throughput(cfg, link_config) -> None:
> + common_link_modes = link_config.common_link_modes
> + if not common_link_modes:
> + KsftSkipEx("No common link modes found")
> + if link_config.partner_netif == None:
> + KsftSkipEx("Partner interface name not available")
> + if link_config.check_autoneg_supported() and link_config.check_autoneg_supported(remote=True):
> + KsftSkipEx("Auto-negotiation not supported by local or remote")
> + cfg.require_cmd("iperf3", remote=True)
> + try:
> + """iperf3 server to be run in the remote pc"""
> + command = "iperf3 -s -D"
> + process = cmd(command, host=cfg.remote)
It's probably better use '--one-off' and run the command in background.
You should wait for the listener to be available with wait_port_listen()
Also you can consider extending the existing GenerateTraffic() class in
tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/lib/py/load.py
[...]
> +def main() -> None:
> + with NetDrvEpEnv(__file__, nsim_test=False) as cfg:
> + link_config = LinkConfig(cfg)
> + ksft_run(globs=globals(), case_pfx={"test_"}, args=(cfg, link_config,))
Instead of having a single test with all proto and speeds, what about
using a tests list, each of them using a given protocol and speed, so
that the user see more fine grain results?
Thanks
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists