| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20241023092251529-0700.eberman@hu-eberman-lv.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 09:30:21 -0700
From: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
CC: Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Bartosz Golaszewski" <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson
<andersson@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"Conor
Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi
<lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Olof Johansson
<olof@...om.net>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Sebastian Reichel
<sre@...nel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Will Deacon
<will@...nel.org>,
<cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org>,
"Satya Durga
Srinivasu Prabhala" <quic_satyap@...cinc.com>,
Melody Olvera
<quic_molvera@...cinc.com>,
Shivendra Pratap <quic_spratap@...cinc.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Florian Fainelli
<florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] firmware: psci: Read and use vendor reset types
On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 10:42:46PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Elliot Berman (2024-10-18 12:39:48)
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> > index 2328ca58bba6..60bc285622ce 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> > @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
> > #include <asm/smp_plat.h>
> > #include <asm/suspend.h>
> >
> > +#define REBOOT_PREFIX "mode-"
>
> Maybe move this near the function that uses it.
>
> > +
> > /*
> > * While a 64-bit OS can make calls with SMC32 calling conventions, for some
> > * calls it is necessary to use SMC64 to pass or return 64-bit values.
> > @@ -305,9 +315,29 @@ static int get_set_conduit_method(const struct device_node *np)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static void psci_vendor_sys_reset2(unsigned long action, void *data)
> > +{
> > + const char *cmd = data;
> > + unsigned long ret;
> > + size_t i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < num_psci_reset_params; i++) {
> > + if (!strcmp(psci_reset_params[i].mode, cmd)) {
> > + ret = invoke_psci_fn(PSCI_FN_NATIVE(1_1, SYSTEM_RESET2),
> > + psci_reset_params[i].reset_type,
> > + psci_reset_params[i].cookie, 0);
> > + pr_err("failed to perform reset \"%s\": %ld\n",
> > + cmd, (long)ret);
>
> Do this intentionally return? Should it be some other function that's
> __noreturn instead and a while (1) if the firmware returns back to the
> kernel?
>
Yes, I think it's best to make sure we fall back to the architectural
reset (whether it's the SYSTEM_RESET or architectural SYSTEM_RESET2)
since device would reboot then.
> > + }
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > static int psci_sys_reset(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
> > void *data)
> > {
> > + if (data && num_psci_reset_params)
> > + psci_vendor_sys_reset2(action, data);
> > +
> > if ((reboot_mode == REBOOT_WARM || reboot_mode == REBOOT_SOFT) &&
> > psci_system_reset2_supported) {
> > /*
> > @@ -750,6 +780,68 @@ static const struct of_device_id psci_of_match[] __initconst = {
> > {},
> > };
> >
> > +static int __init psci_init_system_reset2_modes(void)
> > +{
> > + const size_t len = strlen(REBOOT_PREFIX);
> > + struct psci_reset_param *param;
> > + struct device_node *psci_np __free(device_node) = NULL;
> > + struct device_node *np __free(device_node) = NULL;
> > + struct property *prop;
> > + size_t count = 0;
> > + u32 magic[2];
> > + int num;
> > +
> > + if (!psci_system_reset2_supported)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + psci_np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, psci_of_match);
> > + if (!psci_np)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + np = of_find_node_by_name(psci_np, "reset-types");
> > + if (!np)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + for_each_property_of_node(np, prop) {
> > + if (strncmp(prop->name, REBOOT_PREFIX, len))
> > + continue;
> > + num = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, prop->name, sizeof(magic[0]));
>
> Use of_property_count_u32_elems()?
>
> > + if (num != 1 && num != 2)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + count++;
> > + }
> > +
> > + param = psci_reset_params = kcalloc(count, sizeof(*psci_reset_params), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!psci_reset_params)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + for_each_property_of_node(np, prop) {
> > + if (strncmp(prop->name, REBOOT_PREFIX, len))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + param->mode = kstrdup_const(prop->name + len, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!param->mode)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + num = of_property_read_variable_u32_array(np, prop->name, magic, 1, 2);
>
> ARRAY_SIZE(magic)?
>
> > + if (num < 0) {
>
> Should this be less than 1?
>
of_property_read_variable_u32_array should return -EOVERFLOW (or maybe
-ENODATA) if the array is empty. I don't see it's possible for
of_property_read_variable_u32_array() to return a non-negative value
that's not 1 or 2.
> > + pr_warn("Failed to parse vendor reboot mode %s\n", param->mode);
> > + kfree_const(param->mode);
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Force reset type to be in vendor space */
> > + param->reset_type = PSCI_1_1_RESET_TYPE_VENDOR_START | magic[0];
> > + param->cookie = num == 2 ? magic[1] : 0;
>
> ARRAY_SIZE(magic)?
>
> > + param++;
> > + num_psci_reset_params++;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists