[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3862bfc6-c2f9-4aef-98fd-1f2b5318a2a7@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 11:52:51 -0700
From: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
"Joerg
Roedel" <joro@...tes.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Trilok Soni
<quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>,
Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala
<quic_satyap@...cinc.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Document sm8750 SMMU
On 10/23/2024 1:25 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 04:04:49PM -0700, Melody Olvera wrote:
>> Document the sm8750 SMMU block.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
> This is incomplete, what about clocks?
I agree, but I don't have the dt changes for the additional smmu node yet.
Should I update the bindings regardless?
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists