[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8c4209a4-f6d4-4289-9c57-0ef0188149f3@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 20:57:50 +0200
From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>
To: Mohamed Ghanmi <mohamed.ghanmi@...com.tn>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
corentin.chary@...il.com, luke@...nes.dev, hdegoede@...hat.com,
ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michael Larabel <Michael@...ronix.com>,
Casey Bowman <casey.g.bowman@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: asus-wmi: Support setting AIPT modes
Am 23.10.24 um 19:59 schrieb Mohamed Ghanmi:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 06:31:17PM +0200, Armin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 23.10.24 um 16:44 schrieb Mohamed Ghanmi:
>>
>>> Hello !
>>> On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 09:42:45PM +0200, Armin Wolf wrote:
>>>> Am 20.10.24 um 21:05 schrieb Armin Wolf:
>>>>
>>>>> Am 20.10.24 um 08:50 schrieb Srinivas Pandruvada:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Some recent Asus laptops are supporting ASUS Intelligent Performance
>>>>>> Technology (AIPT). This solution allows users to have maximized CPU
>>>>>> performance in models with a chassis providing more thermal head room.
>>>>>> Refer to [1].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are major performance issues when Linux is installed on these
>>>>>> laptops compared to Windows install. One such report is published for
>>>>>> Graphics benchmarks on Asus ASUS Zenbook S 14 with Lunar Lake
>>>>>> processors [2].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By default, these laptops are booting in "Whisper Mode" till OS power
>>>>>> management or tools change this to other AIPT mode. This "Whisper" mode
>>>>>> calls to set lower maximum and minimum RAPL (Running Average Power
>>>>>> Limit)
>>>>>> via thermal tables. On Linux this leads to lower performance even when
>>>>>> platform power profile is "balanced". This "Whisper" mode should
>>>>>> correspond to "quiet" mode.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, when AIPT is present change the default mode to "Standard" during
>>>>>> boot. Map the three platform power profile modes as follows:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Power Profile Mode AIPT mode
>>>>>> -----------------------------------
>>>>>> quiet Whisper
>>>>>> balanced Standard
>>>>>> performance Performance
>>>>>> ------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here AIPT mode can be detected by checking presese of "FANL" method
>>>>>> under
>>>>>> PNP HID "PNP0C14" and UID "ATK". If AIPT mode is present, this takes
>>>>>> precedence over the existing VIVO thermal policy. These modes are set
>>>>>> using "FANL" method.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Although this “FANL” method is not used in the Asus WMI driver, users
>>>>>> have used this method from user space [3] to set AIPT modes. Used this
>>>>>> as a reference.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Link:
>>>>>> https://www.asus.com/content/laptop-asus-intelligent-performance-technology-aipt/
>>>>>> # [1]
>>>>>> Reported-by: Michael Larabel <Michael@...ronix.com>
>>>>>> Closes: https://www.phoronix.com/review/lunar-lake-xe2/5 # [2]
>>>>>> Link: https://github.com/dominiksalvet/asus-fan-control/issues/151 # [3]
>>>>>> Tested-by: Casey Bowman <casey.g.bowman@...el.com>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
>>>>>> index 7a48220b4f5a..06689d0f98c7 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
>>>>>> @@ -100,6 +100,11 @@ module_param(fnlock_default, bool, 0444);
>>>>>> #define ASUS_THROTTLE_THERMAL_POLICY_SILENT_VIVO 1
>>>>>> #define ASUS_THROTTLE_THERMAL_POLICY_OVERBOOST_VIVO 2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +#define AIPT_STANDARD 0
>>>>>> +#define AIPT_WHISPER 1
>>>>>> +#define AIPT_PERFORMANCE 2
>>>>>> +#define AIPT_FULL_SPEED 3
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> #define PLATFORM_PROFILE_MAX 2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #define USB_INTEL_XUSB2PR 0xD0
>>>>>> @@ -333,6 +338,9 @@ struct asus_wmi {
>>>>>> struct asus_wmi_debug debug;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> struct asus_wmi_driver *driver;
>>>>>> + acpi_handle acpi_mgmt_handle;
>>>>>> + int asus_aipt_mode;
>>>>>> + bool asus_aipt_present;
>>>>>> };
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /* WMI
>>>>>> ************************************************************************/
>>>>>> @@ -3804,6 +3812,19 @@ static ssize_t
>>>>>> throttle_thermal_policy_store(struct device *dev,
>>>>>> static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(throttle_thermal_policy);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /* Platform profile
>>>>>> ***********************************************************/
>>>>>> +static int asus_wmi_write_aipt_mode(struct asus_wmi *asus, int
>>>>>> aipt_mode)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + int status;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + status = acpi_execute_simple_method(asus->acpi_mgmt_handle,
>>>>>> "FANL", aipt_mode);
>>>>>> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>>>>>> + acpi_handle_info(asus->acpi_mgmt_handle, "FANL execute
>>>>>> failed\n");
>>>>>> + return -EIO;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> static int asus_wmi_platform_profile_to_vivo(struct asus_wmi *asus,
>>>>>> int mode)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> bool vivo;
>>>>>> @@ -3844,6 +3865,26 @@ static int
>>>>>> asus_wmi_platform_profile_mode_from_vivo(struct asus_wmi *asus, int m
>>>>>> return mode;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +static int asus_wmi_aipt_platform_profile_get(struct asus_wmi *asus,
>>>>>> + enum platform_profile_option *profile)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + switch (asus->asus_aipt_mode) {
>>>>>> + case AIPT_STANDARD:
>>>>>> + *profile = PLATFORM_PROFILE_BALANCED;
>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>> + case AIPT_PERFORMANCE:
>>>>>> + *profile = PLATFORM_PROFILE_PERFORMANCE;
>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>> + case AIPT_WHISPER:
>>>>>> + *profile = PLATFORM_PROFILE_QUIET;
>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>> + default:
>>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> static int asus_wmi_platform_profile_get(struct
>>>>>> platform_profile_handler *pprof,
>>>>>> enum platform_profile_option *profile)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> @@ -3851,6 +3892,10 @@ static int
>>>>>> asus_wmi_platform_profile_get(struct platform_profile_handler *pprof,
>>>>>> int tp;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> asus = container_of(pprof, struct asus_wmi,
>>>>>> platform_profile_handler);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if (asus->asus_aipt_present)
>>>>>> + return asus_wmi_aipt_platform_profile_get(asus, profile);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> tp = asus->throttle_thermal_policy_mode;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> switch (asus_wmi_platform_profile_mode_from_vivo(asus, tp)) {
>>>>>> @@ -3874,26 +3919,42 @@ static int
>>>>>> asus_wmi_platform_profile_set(struct platform_profile_handler *pprof,
>>>>>> enum platform_profile_option profile)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> struct asus_wmi *asus;
>>>>>> - int tp;
>>>>>> + int ret = 0, tp, aipt_mode;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> asus = container_of(pprof, struct asus_wmi,
>>>>>> platform_profile_handler);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> switch (profile) {
>>>>>> case PLATFORM_PROFILE_PERFORMANCE:
>>>>>> tp = ASUS_THROTTLE_THERMAL_POLICY_OVERBOOST;
>>>>>> + aipt_mode = AIPT_PERFORMANCE;
>>>>>> break;
>>>>>> case PLATFORM_PROFILE_BALANCED:
>>>>>> tp = ASUS_THROTTLE_THERMAL_POLICY_DEFAULT;
>>>>>> + aipt_mode = AIPT_STANDARD;
>>>>>> break;
>>>>>> case PLATFORM_PROFILE_QUIET:
>>>>>> tp = ASUS_THROTTLE_THERMAL_POLICY_SILENT;
>>>>>> + aipt_mode = AIPT_WHISPER;
>>>>>> break;
>>>>>> default:
>>>>>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - asus->throttle_thermal_policy_mode =
>>>>>> asus_wmi_platform_profile_to_vivo(asus, tp);
>>>>>> - return throttle_thermal_policy_write(asus);
>>>>>> + if (asus->asus_aipt_present) {
>>>>>> + ret = asus_wmi_write_aipt_mode(asus, aipt_mode);
>>>>>> + if (!ret) {
>>>>>> + asus->asus_aipt_mode = aipt_mode;
>>>>>> + goto skip_vivo;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if (asus->throttle_thermal_policy_dev) {
>>>>>> + asus->throttle_thermal_policy_mode =
>>>>>> asus_wmi_platform_profile_to_vivo(asus, tp);
>>>>>> + ret = throttle_thermal_policy_write(asus);
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +skip_vivo:
>>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> static int platform_profile_setup(struct asus_wmi *asus)
>>>>>> @@ -3905,7 +3966,7 @@ static int platform_profile_setup(struct
>>>>>> asus_wmi *asus)
>>>>>> * Not an error if a component platform_profile relies on is
>>>>>> unavailable
>>>>>> * so early return, skipping the setup of platform_profile.
>>>>>> */
>>>>>> - if (!asus->throttle_thermal_policy_dev)
>>>>>> + if (!asus->throttle_thermal_policy_dev && !asus->asus_aipt_present)
>>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> dev_info(dev, "Using throttle_thermal_policy for
>>>>>> platform_profile support\n");
>>>>>> @@ -4538,6 +4599,7 @@ static int asus_wmi_sysfs_init(struct
>>>>>> platform_device *device)
>>>>>> static int asus_wmi_platform_init(struct asus_wmi *asus)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> struct device *dev = &asus->platform_device->dev;
>>>>>> + struct acpi_device *adev;
>>>>>> char *wmi_uid;
>>>>>> int rv;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @@ -4593,6 +4655,29 @@ static int asus_wmi_platform_init(struct
>>>>>> asus_wmi *asus)
>>>>>> asus_wmi_set_devstate(ASUS_WMI_DEVID_CWAP,
>>>>>> asus->driver->quirks->wapf, NULL);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + /*
>>>>>> + * Check presence of Intelligent Performance Technology (AIPT).
>>>>>> + * If present store acpi handle and set asus_aipt_present to true.
>>>>>> + */
>>>>>> + adev = acpi_dev_get_first_match_dev("PNP0C14", "ATK", -1);
>>>>> Is there really no way of changing the AIPT mode through the WMI
>>>>> interface?
>>>>> I would prefer using the WMI interface if available, since the
>>>>> firmware might
>>>>> assume that FANL is only called through the WMI interface.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you have a acpidump from a affected device?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Armin Wolf
>>>>>
>>>> I found a acpidump from a ASUS device with a matching FANL method. It seems that this method
>>>> can indeed be called using the WMI interface using the DEVS() WMI method:
>>>>
>>>> [WmiMethodId(1398162756), Implemented] void DEVS([in] uint32 Device_ID, [in] uint32 Control_status, [out] uint32 result);
>>>>
>>>> If Device_ID is 0x00110019, then Control_status is passed to the FANL ACPI method.
>>>>
>>>> It also seems that support for AIPT can be queried using the DSTS() WMI method:
>>>>
>>>> [WmiMethodId(1398035268), Implemented] void DSTS([in] uint32 Device_ID, [out] uint32 device_status);
>>>>
>>>> Using Device_ID 0x00110019, the returned device status seems to contain the following information:
>>>>
>>>> - 16-bit current AIPT mode
>>>> - 4-bit unknown value (possible values 2, 3 and 7, maybe number of supported modes or some kind of bitmap?)
>>>> - 1-bit with is set when (GGIV (0x0907000C) == One) is true
>>> I just saw this conversation and i think that the behaviour this
>>> patch will implement in the driver was already implemented in this patch
>>> that got added to kernel v6.12-rc3:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/20240609144849.2532-2-mohamed.ghanmi@supcom.tn/
>>>
>>> this patch introduced ASUS_WMI_DEVID_THROTTLE_THERMAL_POLICY_VIVO
>>> 0x00110019 which is the device_id that changes the fan profiles. the
>>> naming is not clear because it was initially intended to add support for
>>> fan profiles for vivobook laptops but it ended up adding support
>>> for a lot of modern laptops.
>> Nice, you are absolutely right.
>>
>> So this patch series is effectively already upstream, very good. I did some research and found out
>> that the status of this device id contains the following data:
>>
>> Status Supported Modes
>> -------------------------------
>> 0x00[1]300[xx] 0 1 2
>> 0x000700[xx] 0 1 2
>> 0x000200[xx] ??? (ODV0)
>> 0x000700[xx] 0 1 2
>> 0x0a0700[xx] ??? (ODV0)
>>
>> While i have no clue about the meaning of the remaining bits, i can report that the first 8 Bits
>> contain the current thermal mode. Maybe adding support for this would be nice, so the current
>> thermal mode can be read directly from the hardware.
>>
>> I also found out that on some models the thermal mode actually modifies the ODV0 variable which
>> is consumed by int3400_thermal and exposed to the Intel Thermal Daemon. So maybe the lackluster
>> performance also has something to do with it.
>>
>>> a point that Srinivas Pandruvada mentioned about RAPL (Running Average Power Limit)
>>> is valid for a lot of modern vivobook and zenbook laptops but i think
>>> it's unrelated to fan profiles.
>>>
>>> a lot of asus laptops that have intel cpus suffer from power throttling.
>>> for exemple in my case using windows, changing fan profiles will lead to max power
>>> changing to the values indicated in the table below (asus vivobook 16x
>>> pro k6604) which leads to higher performance than linux
>>>
>>> fan Profile power limit
>>> -----------------------------------
>>> Whisper 50watts
>>> Standard 120watts
>>> Performance 149watts
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>> However in linux, even after changing to the appropriate fan profile,
>>> the power is still capped at 50watts and i found the reason why
>>>
>>> here is the results of using the powercap-info command:
>>>
>>> intel-rapl-mmio
>>> enabled: 1
>>> Zone 0
>>> name: package-0
>>> enabled: 1
>>> max_energy_range_uj: 262143328850
>>> Constraint 0
>>> name: long_term
>>> power_limit_uw: 30000000
>>> time_window_us: 55967744
>>> max_power_uw: 55000000
>>> Constraint 1
>>> name: short_term
>>> power_limit_uw: 55000000
>>> time_window_us: 2440
>>> max_power_uw: 0
>>> intel-rapl
>>> enabled: 1
>>> Zone 0
>>> name: package-0
>>> enabled: 1
>>> max_energy_range_uj: 262143328850
>>> Constraint 0
>>> name: long_term
>>> power_limit_uw: 157000000
>>> time_window_us: 55967744
>>> max_power_uw: 55000000
>>> Constraint 1
>>> name: short_term
>>> power_limit_uw: 157000000
>>> time_window_us: 2440
>>> max_power_uw: 0
>>> Constraint 2
>>> name: peak_power
>>> power_limit_uw: 200000000
>>> max_power_uw: 0
>>> Zone 0:0
>>> name: core
>>> enabled: 0
>>> max_energy_range_uj: 262143328850
>>> Constraint 0
>>> name: long_term
>>> power_limit_uw: 0
>>> time_window_us: 976
>>> Zone 0:1
>>> name: uncore
>>> enabled: 0
>>> max_energy_range_uj: 262143328850
>>> Constraint 0
>>> name: long_term
>>> power_limit_uw: 0
>>> time_window_us: 976
>>> Zone 1
>>> name: psys
>>> enabled: 0
>>> max_energy_range_uj: 262143328850
>>> Constraint 0
>>> name: long_term
>>> power_limit_uw: 0
>>> time_window_us: 27983872
>>> Constraint 1
>>> name: short_term
>>> power_limit_uw: 0
>>> time_window_us: 976
>>>
>>>
>>> as seen by the output of the command, the intel-rapl-mmio is causing the
>>> throttling as it sets power_limit_uw to 30 watts (readonly). so the current fix
>>> that i'm currently using is disabling the intel-rapl-mmio leaving only
>>> the intel-rapl which sets power_limit_uw to 157watts using this
>>> command: powercap-set -p intel-rapl-mmio -z 0 -e 0
>>>
>>> this will lead to the laptop being able to reach it's maximum power
>>> limit.
>>>
>>> after doing this, when i change the platform profile through sysfs the
>>> laptop will start behaving as described in the table above exactly like
>>> windows.
>>>
>>> in conclusion, the asus-wmi driver already has the platform profiles
>>> (a.k.a fan profiles)
>>> implemented and I think that the power throttling is caused by either
>>> intel Power Capping Framework or asus bios.
>> Or the Intel Thermal Daemon somehow does not properly support intel-rapl-mmio
>> or is not installed.
> This was exactly it. the Intel Thermal Daemon wasn't installed. now
> everything is working as expected!
>
> Best regards,
> Mohamed G.
Interesting.
Srinivas, can you verify that the Intel Thermal Daemon is installed on the affected
Asus machines?
I begin to wonder why this thermal daemon is a userspace component, stuff like thermal
management should use the thermal subsystem inside the kernel.
Thanks,
Armin Wolf
Powered by blists - more mailing lists