[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8d035aca-b417-42ab-9c42-759c2695b45a@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 14:14:55 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@....com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, H Peter Anvin
<hpa@...or.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>,
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>, D Scott Phillips OS
<scott@...amperecomputing.com>, <carl@...amperecomputing.com>,
<lcherian@...vell.com>, <bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>,
<tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>, <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, Jamie Iles
<quic_jiles@...cinc.com>, Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
<peternewman@...gle.com>, <dfustini@...libre.com>, <amitsinght@...vell.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Rex Nie <rex.nie@...uarmicro.com>,
"Dave Martin" <dave.martin@....com>, Shaopeng Tan
<tan.shaopeng@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/40] x86/resctrl: Add max_bw to struct resctrl_membw
Hi James,
On 10/4/24 11:03 AM, James Morse wrote:
> __rdt_get_mem_config_amd() and __get_mem_config_intel() both use
> the default_ctrl property as a maximum value. This is because the
> MBA schema works differently between these platforms. Doing this
The schema works differently but they can still use the same property
as maximum, is that a problem?
> complicates determining whether the default_ctrl property belongs
> to the arch code, or can be derived from the schema format.
So instead of Intel and AMD both using default_ctrl as a maximum this patch
introduces a new max_bw with both using that as maximum instead.
Unclear how this change fixes the unclear complication.
>
> Add a max_bw property for x86 platforms to specify their maximum
> MBA bandwidth. This isn't needed for other schema formats.
It is not clear to me how replacing one value with a new value that is
used in exactly the same way addresses the initial complaint of complication.
>
> This will allow the default_ctrl to be generated from the schema
> properties when it is needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@...amperecomputing.com> # arm64
> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...fujitsu.com>
> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> * This patch is new.
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c | 3 +++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c | 9 +++++----
> include/linux/resctrl.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> index 4c16e58c4a1b..e79807a8f060 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> @@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ static bool __get_mem_config_intel(struct rdt_resource *r)
> hw_res->num_closid = edx.split.cos_max + 1;
> max_delay = eax.split.max_delay + 1;
> r->default_ctrl = MAX_MBA_BW;
> + r->membw.max_bw = MAX_MBA_BW;
> r->membw.arch_needs_linear = true;
> if (ecx & MBA_IS_LINEAR) {
> r->membw.delay_linear = true;
> @@ -248,6 +249,8 @@ static bool __rdt_get_mem_config_amd(struct rdt_resource *r)
> cpuid_count(0x80000020, subleaf, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> hw_res->num_closid = edx + 1;
> r->default_ctrl = 1 << eax;
> + r->schema_fmt = RESCTRL_SCHEMA_RANGE;
Stray change?
> + r->membw.max_bw = 1 << eax;
>
> /* AMD does not use delay */
> r->membw.delay_linear = false;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
> index 8d1bdfe89692..56c41bfd07e4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
> @@ -57,10 +57,10 @@ static bool bw_validate(char *buf, unsigned long *data, struct rdt_resource *r)
> return false;
> }
>
> - if ((bw < r->membw.min_bw || bw > r->default_ctrl) &&
> + if ((bw < r->membw.min_bw || bw > r->membw.max_bw) &&
> !is_mba_sc(r)) {
> rdt_last_cmd_printf("MB value %ld out of range [%d,%d]\n", bw,
> - r->membw.min_bw, r->default_ctrl);
> + r->membw.min_bw, r->membw.max_bw);
> return false;
> }
>
> @@ -108,8 +108,9 @@ static int parse_bw(struct rdt_parse_data *data, struct resctrl_schema *s,
> */
> static bool cbm_validate(char *buf, u32 *data, struct rdt_resource *r)
> {
> - unsigned long first_bit, zero_bit, val;
> + u32 supported_bits = BIT_MASK(r->cache.cbm_len + 1) - 1;
Same issue as V4:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/ca528ebd-fb76-40cd-a495-88c2de443cd8@intel.com/
> unsigned int cbm_len = r->cache.cbm_len;
> + unsigned long first_bit, zero_bit, val;
> int ret;
>
> ret = kstrtoul(buf, 16, &val);
> @@ -118,7 +119,7 @@ static bool cbm_validate(char *buf, u32 *data, struct rdt_resource *r)
> return false;
> }
>
> - if ((r->cache.min_cbm_bits > 0 && val == 0) || val > r->default_ctrl) {
> + if ((r->cache.min_cbm_bits > 0 && val == 0) || val > supported_bits) {
> rdt_last_cmd_puts("Mask out of range\n");
> return false;
> }
The above two changes have nothing to do with memory bandwidth. They are unrelated
to the changelog.
> diff --git a/include/linux/resctrl.h b/include/linux/resctrl.h
> index 0f61673c9165..b66cd977b658 100644
> --- a/include/linux/resctrl.h
> +++ b/include/linux/resctrl.h
> @@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ enum membw_throttle_mode {
> /**
> * struct resctrl_membw - Memory bandwidth allocation related data
> * @min_bw: Minimum memory bandwidth percentage user can request
> + * @max_bw: Maximum memory bandwidth value, used as the reset value
> * @bw_gran: Granularity at which the memory bandwidth is allocated
> * @delay_linear: True if memory B/W delay is in linear scale
> * @arch_needs_linear: True if we can't configure non-linear resources
> @@ -175,6 +176,7 @@ enum membw_throttle_mode {
> */
> struct resctrl_membw {
> u32 min_bw;
> + u32 max_bw;
> u32 bw_gran;
> u32 delay_linear;
> bool arch_needs_linear;
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists