[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cba3e0e8-6632-4c92-9afc-f3c10c719bd3@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 15:44:24 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@....com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, H Peter Anvin
<hpa@...or.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>,
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>, D Scott Phillips OS
<scott@...amperecomputing.com>, <carl@...amperecomputing.com>,
<lcherian@...vell.com>, <bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>,
<tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>, <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, Jamie Iles
<quic_jiles@...cinc.com>, Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
<peternewman@...gle.com>, <dfustini@...libre.com>, <amitsinght@...vell.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Rex Nie <rex.nie@...uarmicro.com>,
"Dave Martin" <dave.martin@....com>, Shaopeng Tan
<tan.shaopeng@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 23/40] x86/resctrl: Add resctrl_arch_ prefix to pseudo
lock functions
Hi James,
On 10/4/24 11:03 AM, James Morse wrote:
> resctrl's pseudo lock has some copy-to-cache and measurement
> functions that are micro-architecture specific. pseudo_lock_fn()
> is not at all portable. Label these 'resctrl_arch_' so they stay
> under /arch/x86.
No mention in changelog why static is also dropped during rename and
functions moved to a header file while no call sites are changed.
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists