[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <671988f6c0141_4bc2294b9@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 16:38:30 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
CC: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, <dave.jiang@...el.com>, <logang@...tatee.com>,
<bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <jack@...e.cz>, <jgg@...pe.ca>,
<catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>, <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
<npiggin@...il.com>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
<willy@...radead.org>, <djwong@...nel.org>, <tytso@....edu>,
<linmiaohe@...wei.com>, <david@...hat.com>, <peterx@...hat.com>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
<nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>, <jhubbard@...dia.com>, <hch@....de>,
<david@...morbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] huge_memory: Allow mappings of PMD sized pages
Alistair Popple wrote:
>
> Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com> writes:
>
> > Alistair Popple wrote:
> >> Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> >>> +
> >>> + return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
> >>> +}
> >>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dax_insert_pfn_pmd);
> >>
> >> Like I mentioned before, lets make the exported function
> >> vmf_insert_folio() and move the pte, pmd, pud internal private / static
> >> details of the implementation. The "dax_" specific aspect of this was
> >> removed at the conversion of a dax_pfn to a folio.
> >
> > Ok, let me try that. Note that vmf_insert_pfn{_pmd|_pud} will have to
> > stick around though.
>
> Creating a single vmf_insert_folio() seems somewhat difficult because it
> needs to be called from multiple fault paths (either PTE, PMD or PUD
> fault) and do something different for each.
>
> Specifically the issue I ran into is that DAX does not downgrade PMD
> entries to PTE entries if they are backed by storage. So the PTE fault
> handler will get a PMD-sized DAX entry and therefore a PMD size folio.
>
> The way I tried implementing vmf_insert_folio() was to look at
> folio_order() to determine which internal implementation to call. But
> that doesn't work for a PTE fault, because there's no way to determine
> if we should PTE map a subpage or PMD map the entire folio.
Ah, that conflict makes sense.
> We could pass down some context as to what type of fault we're handling,
> or add it to the vmf struct, but that seems excessive given callers
> already know this and could just call a specific
> vmf_insert_page_{pte|pmd|pud}.
Ok, I think it is good to capture that "because dax does not downgrade
entries it may satisfy PTE faults with PMD inserts", or something like
that in comment or changelog.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists