linux-kernel - Re: CVE-2024-47725: dm-verity: restart or panic on an I/O error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024102352-stable-eats-61b2@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 08:07:25 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Li Lingfeng <lilingfeng3@...wei.com>
Cc: cve@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-cve-announce@...r.kernel.org,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
	yangerkun <yangerkun@...wei.com>, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>,
	"zhangyi (F)" <yi.zhang@...wei.com>, Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>,
	chengzhihao1@...wei.com, zhangerying <zhangerying@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: CVE-2024-47725: dm-verity: restart or panic on an I/O error

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 09:37:26AM +0800, Li Lingfeng wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I noticed that the fix patch for this CVE has been reverted by commit
> 462763212dd7("Revert: "dm-verity: restart or panic on an I/O error"").
> So should this CVE also be rejected?

Yes it should, as the revert happened in the same releases.  I'll go do
that now, thanks for the review!

greg k-h