[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a0c337d-ff4f-4da9-945d-12fe7119fef7@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 23:48:03 -0700
From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
To: "Zhuo, Qiuxu" <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
CC: "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] x86/mce: Convert multiple if () statements into
a switch() statement
On 10/22/2024 7:08 PM, Zhuo, Qiuxu wrote:
> OK. So, back to your original question below, what is your answer to it now? :-)
>
> "Can some of the hardcoded numbers be changed to vfm macros as well?"
>
Even though it takes a tiny bit of reading to understand the VFM macros,
the pros significantly outweigh the cons. I still feel we should go
ahead and make the changes.
I have responded with minor comments to your patch.
Sohil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists