linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] bcachefs: fix shift oob in alloc_lru_idx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <68aa186e-a6ab-4fd8-bc17-6d131a80636b@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 09:11:01 +0800
From: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@...wei.com>
To: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@...il.com>
CC: <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>, <mmpgouride@...il.com>,
	<linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<syzbot+7f45fa9805c40db3f108@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] bcachefs: fix shift oob in alloc_lru_idx_fragmentation



On 2024/10/22 12:05, Jeongjun Park wrote:
> 
> 
>> Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@...wei.com> wrote:
>>
>> 
>>
>>> On 2024/10/21 23:43, Jeongjun Park wrote:
>>> The size of a.data_type is set abnormally large, causing shift-out-of-bounds.
>>> To fix this, we need to add validation on a.data_type in
>>> alloc_lru_idx_fragmentation().
>>> Reported-by: syzbot+7f45fa9805c40db3f108@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>>> Fixes: 260af1562ec1 ("bcachefs: Kill alloc_v4.fragmentation_lru")
>>> Signed-off-by: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>>   fs/bcachefs/alloc_background.h | 3 +++
>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>> diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/alloc_background.h b/fs/bcachefs/alloc_background.h
>>> index f8e87c6721b1..163a67b97a40 100644
>>> --- a/fs/bcachefs/alloc_background.h
>>> +++ b/fs/bcachefs/alloc_background.h
>>> @@ -168,6 +168,9 @@ static inline bool data_type_movable(enum bch_data_type type)
>>>   static inline u64 alloc_lru_idx_fragmentation(struct bch_alloc_v4 a,
>>>                             struct bch_dev *ca)
>>>   {
>>> +    if (a.data_type >= BCH_DATA_NR)
>>> +        return 0;
>>> +
>>
>> oh, I found I have done the same thing in [1]("Re: [syzbot] [bcachefs?] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in bch2_alloc_to_text"). But in my humble opinion, the validation changes also should be added. And in addition, move the condition about a.data_type into data_type_movable will be better. Just my personal opinion.:)
>>
>> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg5412619.html
> 
> I still disagree with the fix to make data_type_movable() do the validation,
> but I think [1] is definitely a patch that needs to be added.
> 
> However, [1] is far from preventing the shift oob vulnerability described
> in that syzbot report. Therefore, I think [1] should be written as a
> standalone patch and committed, rather than as a patch for that

I'm fine for this.:)

Thanks,
Hongbo

> syzbot report.
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hongbo
>>
>>>       if (!data_type_movable(a.data_type) ||
>>>           !bch2_bucket_sectors_fragmented(ca, a))
>>>           return 0;
>>> --