[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6a73c0d3-879a-412b-9345-e4d5ccb52e78@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 18:25:33 +0800
From: Tingguo Cheng <quic_tingguoc@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: <quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com>, <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>,
<kernel@...cinc.com>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio
<konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs615: Adds SPMI bus, PMIC and
peripherals
On 10/22/2024 5:38 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 at 11:26, Tingguo Cheng <quic_tingguoc@...cinc.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/14/2024 6:53 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 06:08:17PM +0800, Tingguo Cheng wrote:
>>>> Create a new file qcs615-pmic.dtsi to add on-board PMIC and peripher-
>>>> als in the PMIC that controlled by SPMI bus. The peripherals include
>>>> GPIO, RTC, PON, power key and resin-key for QCS615 platform. The power
>>>> key and volume down key are controlled by PMIC PON hardware on QCS615.
>>>
>>> Why do you need a separate file? Unless there is a good reason such
>>> configuration should be split between the pmic.dtsi and the board file.
>>>
>> One reason is that I use upstream as
>> template(x1ee80100,sc8180x,sa8775p...), they all have
>> platform-pmics.dtsi alongside.
>>
>> On the other hand, qcs615-pmic.dtsi contains only the PMIC's
>> peripherals, creating a new file can eliminate duplicate code if there
>> are any other new boards with pmm6155au as their PMIC(similar to
>> x1e80100-lenovo-xxx/x1e80100-microsoft-xxxx, where "x1e80100-pmics.dtsi"
>> has been included).
>
> And this is pretty unique to those platforms and it exists mostly to
> facilitate the case when a platform has several instances of the same
> PMIC. In all other cases (mobile, IoT) usually there is just one
> instance of the particular PMIC. In such a case pmic definitions go to
> "pmABCDEF.dtsi" to be reused by the platform and then board DT can
> include that file and wire it up according to the platform needs.
>
Yes, in this case, there is only one PMIC. So making a new file does not
make sense except the PMIC is totally a new design.
>>> BTW, what is the PMIC id for pmm6155au? Is it a real PMIC or a version
>>> of some other PMIC?
>>>
>> pmm6155au is the PMIC id(Silk scree). It's a real PMIC for qcs615.Maybe
>> I should use the name qcs615-pmics.dtsi instead of qcs6150-pmic.dtsi to
>> align with other platforms.
>
> Is it the same thing as PM6150? Or is it a combo of PM6150 and PM6150L?
>
I got your point, I did some more research, it's a variant of pm8150. In
this case, I will upload a new version that makes DT to be changed after
it includes pm8150.dtsi.
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tingguo Cheng <quic_tingguoc@...cinc.com>
>
--
Thank you & BRs
Tingguo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists