linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 04/43] arm64: RME: Handle Granule Protection Faults (GPFs)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yq5a8qudmvp6.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 19:47:41 +0530
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...nel.org>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@....com>,
	Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
	Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@...amperecomputing.com>,
	Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>,
	Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>,
	Alper Gun <alpergun@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/43] arm64: RME: Handle Granule Protection Faults
 (GPFs)

Steven Price <steven.price@....com> writes:

> If the host attempts to access granules that have been delegated for use
> in a realm these accesses will be caught and will trigger a Granule
> Protection Fault (GPF).
>
> A fault during a page walk signals a bug in the kernel and is handled by
> oopsing the kernel. A non-page walk fault could be caused by user space
> having access to a page which has been delegated to the kernel and will
> trigger a SIGBUS to allow debugging why user space is trying to access a
> delegated page.
>

A non-page walk fault can also be caused by host kernel trying to access a
page which it had delegated before. It would be nice to dump details
like FAR in that case. Right now it shows only the below.

[  285.122310] Internal error: Granule Protection Fault not on table walk: 0000000096000068 [#1] PREEMPT SMP               
[  285.122427] Modules linked in:                                                                                                                                                
[  285.122512] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 217 Comm: kvm-vcpu-0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc1-00082-g8461d8333829 #42
[  285.122656] Hardware name: FVP Base RevC (DT)
[  285.122733] pstate: 81400009 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[  285.122871] pc : clear_page+0x18/0x50
[  285.122975] lr : kvm_gmem_get_pfn+0xbc/0x190
[  285.123110] sp : ffff800082cef900
[  285.123182] x29: ffff800082cef910 x28: 0000000090000000 x27: 0000000090000006
.....

-aneesh

>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
>  * Include missing "Granule Protection Fault at level -1"
> ---
>  arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> index 8b281cf308b3..f9d72a936d48 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> @@ -804,6 +804,25 @@ static int do_tag_check_fault(unsigned long far, unsigned long esr,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int do_gpf_ptw(unsigned long far, unsigned long esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	const struct fault_info *inf = esr_to_fault_info(esr);
> +
> +	die_kernel_fault(inf->name, far, esr, regs);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int do_gpf(unsigned long far, unsigned long esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	const struct fault_info *inf = esr_to_fault_info(esr);
> +
> +	if (!is_el1_instruction_abort(esr) && fixup_exception(regs))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	arm64_notify_die(inf->name, regs, inf->sig, inf->code, far, esr);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct fault_info fault_info[] = {
>  	{ do_bad,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"ttbr address size fault"	},
>  	{ do_bad,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"level 1 address size fault"	},
> @@ -840,12 +859,12 @@ static const struct fault_info fault_info[] = {
>  	{ do_bad,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"unknown 32"			},
>  	{ do_alignment_fault,	SIGBUS,  BUS_ADRALN,	"alignment fault"		},
>  	{ do_bad,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"unknown 34"			},
> -	{ do_bad,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"unknown 35"			},
> -	{ do_bad,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"unknown 36"			},
> -	{ do_bad,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"unknown 37"			},
> -	{ do_bad,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"unknown 38"			},
> -	{ do_bad,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"unknown 39"			},
> -	{ do_bad,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"unknown 40"			},
> +	{ do_gpf_ptw,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"Granule Protection Fault at level -1" },
> +	{ do_gpf_ptw,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"Granule Protection Fault at level 0" },
> +	{ do_gpf_ptw,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"Granule Protection Fault at level 1" },
> +	{ do_gpf_ptw,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"Granule Protection Fault at level 2" },
> +	{ do_gpf_ptw,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"Granule Protection Fault at level 3" },
> +	{ do_gpf,		SIGBUS,  SI_KERNEL,	"Granule Protection Fault not on table walk" },
>  	{ do_bad,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"level -1 address size fault"	},
>  	{ do_bad,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"unknown 42"			},
>  	{ do_translation_fault,	SIGSEGV, SEGV_MAPERR,	"level -1 translation fault"	},
> -- 
> 2.34.1