[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ1PR11MB608380793D6F55A62332E0D1FC4E2@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:42:28 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "Zhuo, Qiuxu" <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>, "Hansen, Dave"
<dave.hansen@...el.com>, "Mehta, Sohil" <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
CC: "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 06/10] x86/mce: Convert multiple if () statements into
a switch() statement
- if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model < 0x1A && this_cpu_read(mce_num_banks) > 0)
+ if (c->x86_vfm < INTEL_NEHALEM_EP && this_cpu_read(mce_num_banks) > 0)
mce_banks[0].init = false;
Updated code now matches for families before 6 (486, Pentium). 486 would never get
to this code. But I think from the comments about machine check bank 0 being magic
that Pentium had some rudimentary support.
Should this be:
if (c->x86_vfm >= INTEL_PENTIUM_PRO && c->x86_vfm < INTEL_NEHALEM_EP && this_cpu_read(mce_num_banks) > 0)
to avoid this semantic change?
- if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model <= 13 && cfg->bootlog < 0)
+ if (c->x86_vfm < INTEL_CORE_YONAH && cfg->bootlog < 0)
cfg->bootlog = 0;
Same as above. New code matches for families 4 and 5.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists