[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7w4xusjyyobyvacm6ogc3q2l26r2vema5rxlb5oqlhs4hpqiu3@dfbde5arh3rg>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 10:26:15 -0700
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
To: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Meta kernel team <kernel-team@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] memcg-v1: remove memcg move locking code
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 04:50:37PM GMT, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 11:57:12PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > The memcg v1's charge move feature has been deprecated. There is no need
> > to have any locking or protection against the moving charge. Let's
> > proceed to remove all the locking code related to charge moving.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
>
> Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
Thanks Roman for the review. Based on Michal's question, I am planning
to keep the RCU locking in the next version of this patch and folowup
with clear understanding where we really need RCU and where we don't.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists