lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <88bd4b6e-d744-4f50-a3ab-34433bbd0ad9@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 18:33:31 +0100
From: "Jiaxun Yang" <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
To: "Peter Cai" <peter@...eblog.net>,
 "James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
 "Serge Semin" <fancer.lancer@...il.com>, "Jon Mason" <jdmason@...zu.us>,
 "Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@...el.com>, "Allen Hubbe" <allenbh@...il.com>,
 ntb@...ts.linux.dev, "Andy Shevchenko" <andy@...nel.org>,
 "Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
 "Kory Maincent" <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>,
 "Cai Huoqing" <cai.huoqing@...ux.dev>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
 "Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
 "Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@...nel.org>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
 "paulburton@...nel.org" <paulburton@...nel.org>,
 "Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
 "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>,
 "linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
 "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
 "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
 "Yoshihiro Shimoda" <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
 linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
 "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>, "Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@...n.ch>, "Russell King" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
 "Vladimir Oltean" <olteanv@...il.com>,
 "Kelvin Cheung" <keguang.zhang@...il.com>,
 "Yanteng Si" <siyanteng@...ngson.cn>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 "Rob Herring" <robh@...nel.org>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@...nel.org>,
 "Guenter Roeck" <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
 "Borislav Petkov" <bp@...en8.de>, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
 "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Andrew Halaney" <ajhalaney@...il.com>, "Nikita Travkin" <nikita@...n.ru>,
 "Ivan Kokshaysky" <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
 "Alexander Shiyan" <shc_work@...l.ru>, "Dmitry Kozlov" <xeb@...l.ru>,
 "Sergey Shtylyov" <s.shtylyov@....ru>,
 "Evgeniy Dushistov" <dushistov@...l.ru>,
 "Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
 "Sergio Paracuellos" <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>,
 "Nikita Shubin" <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>,
 linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 "Kexy Biscuit" <kexybiscuit@...c.io>, jeffbai@...c.io,
 "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux: Goodbye from a Linux community volunteer



在2024年10月24日十月 下午5:30,Peter Cai写道:
> Hi James,
>
> Thanks for your clarification. This sort of non-provocative 
> clarifications of the regulations you need to comply to has always been 
> what the community wants to see. _This_ should have been the first 
> official statement when anyone raised the concern, instead of Greg's 
> attempt to "defuse" the situation over private correspondence, or Linus 
> Torvald's outright defamation and accusing anyone who dares to disagree 
> of being a "Russian troll". This is not even to mention the _complete 
> ignorance_ and arrogance shown by his statement on what sending a revert 
> patch means.
>
> With sanctions in place, there is no reasonable person who will demand 
> the LF or the Linux Kernel maintainers to do otherwise. However, as 
> someone who does rely on Linux for daily work, and as someone who has 
> contributed to the Linux project and its community, I think seeing the 
> following should be the minimum:
>
> 1. Linus Torvalds (+Cc) send an apology letter to **everyone** who he 
> accused of being a Russian troll;
> 2. Linus Torvalds need to **unconditionally retract** his personal 
> attack on Kexy Biscuit, the person who sent the revert patch in protest 
> (+Cc), and acknowledge that people who work with AOSC.io aren't 
> "state-sponsored paid actors";
> 3. This type of statement should be included somewhere public as soon as 
> practically possible should sanction compliance affect kernel 
> development again in the future;
> 4. No personal attacks should be allowed based on tinfoil-hat reasoning.

I agree those actions and IMHO this should be addressed under Linux's
Code of Conduct enforcement [1] framework.

I also look forward to a formal investigation report on the entire event.
It may eventually result in an overhaul of our governance model.

[1]: https://docs.kernel.org/process/code-of-conduct.html

Thanks
>
> Thanks,
> Peter.
[...]
-- 
- Jiaxun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ