linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] PCI: microchip: support using either instance 1 or 2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241024184649.GA967731@bhelgaas>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 13:46:49 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
	Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] PCI: microchip: support using either instance 1
 or 2

On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 10:38:11AM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 09:08:40AM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> > 
> > The current driver and binding for PolarFire SoC's PCI controller assume
> > that the root port instance in use is instance 1. The second reg
> > property constitutes the region encompassing both "control" and "bridge"
> > registers for both instances. In the driver, a fixed offset is applied to
> > find the base addresses for instance 1's "control" and "bridge"
> > registers. The BeagleV Fire uses root port instance 2, so something must
> > be done so that software can differentiate. This series splits the
> > second reg property in two, with dedicated "control" and "bridge"
> > entries so that either instance can be used.
> 
> Just attempting to bump this patchset. It has gone over 2 months without
> response, and I am afraid it has completely fallen between the cracks.

Thanks for bumping this.  It looks pretty straightforward to me, so if
nobody acts on it soon, I'll pick it up.

Bjorn