[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241024191532.78304-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 21:15:32 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH] gpiolib: remove leftover spinlock bits
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
We no longer use any spinlocks in gpiolib.c. Stop including
linux/spinlock.h and remove an outdated comment.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index ae758ba6dc3d..fa68ff574d10 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -24,7 +24,6 @@
#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
-#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/srcu.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
@@ -1223,11 +1222,6 @@ struct gpio_device *gpio_device_find(const void *data,
struct gpio_device *gdev;
struct gpio_chip *gc;
- /*
- * Not yet but in the future the spinlock below will become a mutex.
- * Annotate this function before anyone tries to use it in interrupt
- * context like it happened with gpiochip_find().
- */
might_sleep();
guard(srcu)(&gpio_devices_srcu);
--
2.45.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists