[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANDhNCpy_A2VtFoXFp2EzVQA92fTQgksxE8Y=nF0FVLeeaTJ9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 15:16:02 -0700
From: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
To: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Christopher S Hall <christopher.s.hall@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 19/25] timekeeping: Rework timekeeping_init() to use shadow_timekeeper
On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 1:29 AM Anna-Maria Behnsen
<anna-maria@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> From: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
>
> For timekeeping_init() the sequence count write held time is not relevant
> and it could keep working on the real timekeeper, but there is no reason to
> make it different from other timekeeper updates.
>
> Convert it to operate on the shadow timekeeper.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
> ---
> kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> index 6d21e9bf5c35..bb225534fee1 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> @@ -1778,7 +1778,7 @@ static bool persistent_clock_exists;
> void __init timekeeping_init(void)
> {
> struct timespec64 wall_time, boot_offset, wall_to_mono;
> - struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.timekeeper;
> + struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.shadow_timekeeper;
Same nit as earlier, otherwise
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists