linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the riscv-soc-fixes tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241024-pleading-grub-e50a759dc9c5@spud>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 23:52:26 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Conor Dooley <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the riscv-soc-fixes tree

On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 09:48:19AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The following commit is also in the riscv-dt-fixes tree as a different
> commit (but the same patch):
> 
>   384f2024e1a1 ("MAINTAINERS: invert Misc RISC-V SoC Support's pattern")
> 
> This is commit
> 
>   7d9d88890f04 ("MAINTAINERS: invert Misc RISC-V SoC Support's pattern")
> 
> in the riscv-dt-fixes tree.

Ye, harmless. I found out the other day that this patch had not been
sent as a for v6.11-rcX. I'll drop it from one of the branches, thanks.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)