[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e3e75d14-94dc-4ec5-a72b-4df0ae66655b@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 14:39:34 +0800
From: Qiang Yu <quic_qianyu@...cinc.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
CC: <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>, <vkoul@...nel.org>,
<kishon@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<konradybcio@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>, <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
<quic_msarkar@...cinc.com>, <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>,
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, <kw@...ux.com>, <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
<neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/7] PCI: qcom: Remove BDF2SID mapping config for
SC8280X family SoC
On 10/18/2024 9:51 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 08:04:10PM -0700, Qiang Yu wrote:
>> On SC8280X family SoC, PCIe controllers are connected to SMMUv3, hence
>> they don't need the config_sid() callback in ops_1_9_0 struct. Fix it by
>> introducing a new ops struct, namely ops_1_21_0 which is same as ops_1_9_0
>> without config_sid() callback so that BDF2SID mapping won't be configured
>> during init.
> The sc8280xp PCIe devicetree nodes do not specify an 'iommu-map' so the
> config_sid() callback is effectively a no-op. Please rephrase this so
> that it becomes obvious that this is a clean up rather than fix.
>
>> Fixes: 70574511f3fc ("PCI: qcom: Add support for SC8280XP")
> And drop the Fixes tag.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Qiang Yu <quic_qianyu@...cinc.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
>> index 88a98be930e3..468bd4242e61 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
>> @@ -1367,6 +1367,16 @@ static const struct qcom_pcie_ops ops_2_9_0 = {
>> .ltssm_enable = qcom_pcie_2_3_2_ltssm_enable,
>> };
>>
>> +/* Qcom IP rev.: 1.21.0 */
> Is this the actual IP revision on sc8280xp (and not just the revision
> used on x1e80100)?
Get confirmation from HW team. 1.21.0 is Qcom IP rev of sc8280xp,
Synopsis IP rev is 5.60a.
Thanks,
Qiang
> Please also provide the Synopsis IP rev like the other configs do.
>
>> +static const struct qcom_pcie_ops ops_1_21_0 = {
>> + .get_resources = qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_7_0,
>> + .init = qcom_pcie_init_2_7_0,
>> + .post_init = qcom_pcie_post_init_2_7_0,
>> + .host_post_init = qcom_pcie_host_post_init_2_7_0,
>> + .deinit = qcom_pcie_deinit_2_7_0,
>> + .ltssm_enable = qcom_pcie_2_3_2_ltssm_enable,
>> +};
>> +
>> static const struct qcom_pcie_cfg cfg_1_0_0 = {
>> .ops = &ops_1_0_0,
>> };
> And try to keep these structs sorted by revision. At least put this one
> after ops_1_9_0.
>
> Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists