linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 net-next 11/13] net: enetc: optimize the allocation of tx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20241024065328.521518-12-wei.fang@nxp.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 14:53:26 +0800
From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
To: davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	robh@...nel.org,
	krzk+dt@...nel.org,
	conor+dt@...nel.org,
	vladimir.oltean@....com,
	claudiu.manoil@....com,
	xiaoning.wang@....com,
	Frank.Li@....com,
	christophe.leroy@...roup.eu,
	linux@...linux.org.uk,
	bhelgaas@...gle.com,
	horms@...nel.org
Cc: imx@...ts.linux.dev,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	alexander.stein@...tq-group.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 net-next 11/13] net: enetc: optimize the allocation of tx_bdr

From: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>

There is a situation where num_tx_rings cannot be divided by bdr_int_num.
For example, num_tx_rings is 8 and bdr_int_num is 3. According to the
previous logic, this results in two tx_bdr corresponding memories not
being allocated, so when sending packets to tx ring 6 or 7, wild pointers
will be accessed. Of course, this issue doesn't exist on LS1028A, because
its num_tx_rings is 8, and bdr_int_num is either 1 or 2. However, there
is a risk for the upcoming i.MX95. Therefore, it is necessary to ensure
that each tx_bdr can be allocated to the corresponding memory.

Signed-off-by: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
---
v5: no changes
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
index bd725561b8a2..bccbeb1f355c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
@@ -3049,10 +3049,10 @@ static void enetc_int_vector_destroy(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, int i)
 int enetc_alloc_msix(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *pdev = priv->si->pdev;
+	int v_tx_rings, v_remainder;
 	int num_stack_tx_queues;
 	int first_xdp_tx_ring;
 	int i, n, err, nvec;
-	int v_tx_rings;
 
 	nvec = ENETC_BDR_INT_BASE_IDX + priv->bdr_int_num;
 	/* allocate MSIX for both messaging and Rx/Tx interrupts */
@@ -3066,9 +3066,12 @@ int enetc_alloc_msix(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
 
 	/* # of tx rings per int vector */
 	v_tx_rings = priv->num_tx_rings / priv->bdr_int_num;
+	v_remainder = priv->num_tx_rings % priv->bdr_int_num;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < priv->bdr_int_num; i++) {
-		err = enetc_int_vector_init(priv, i, v_tx_rings);
+		int num_tx_rings = i < v_remainder ? v_tx_rings + 1 : v_tx_rings;
+
+		err = enetc_int_vector_init(priv, i, num_tx_rings);
 		if (err)
 			goto fail;
 	}
-- 
2.34.1