[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ub7yylef6qyztjtg3pciamg6jjznxh3ydlqsdcg2xcoxqngpi4@j5jlex4qukyz>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 09:45:57 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Laurentiu Mihalcea <laurentiumihalcea111@...il.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>, Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.dev>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, sound-open-firmware@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: fsl,imx-rproc: add new
compatible
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 12:21:11PM -0400, Laurentiu Mihalcea wrote:
> From: Laurentiu Mihalcea <laurentiu.mihalcea@....com>
>
> Add new compatible for imx95's CM7 with SOF.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Mihalcea <laurentiu.mihalcea@....com>
> ---
> .../bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml | 58 +++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml
> index 57d75acb0b5e..ab0d8e017965 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml
> @@ -28,6 +28,15 @@ properties:
> - fsl,imx8qxp-cm4
> - fsl,imx8ulp-cm33
> - fsl,imx93-cm33
> + - fsl,imx95-cm7-sof
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 2
> +
> + reg-names:
> + items:
> + - const: dram
> + - const: mailbox
That's quite different programming model. Are you sure these are devices
from similar class/type?
Your big if:then: block suggests this could be separate binding.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists