[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <kuvbuekbzs6saggfxleiaqtl5mleozqozpamivz2zo6pd4istq@c6hfl6govn44>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 21:57:53 -0400
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
To: "Lai, Yi" <yi1.lai@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Syzkaller & bisect] There is INFO: task hung in
__rq_qos_throttle
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 06:27:25PM +0800, Lai, Yi wrote:
> Hi Kent Overstreet,
>
> Greetings!
>
> I used Syzkaller and found that there is INFO: task hung in __rq_qos_throttle in v6.12-rc2
>
> After bisection and the first bad commit is:
> "
> 63332394c7e1 bcachefs: Move snapshot table size to struct snapshot_table
You sure...?
Look at the patch, that's a pretty unlikely culprit; we would've seen
something from kasan, and anyways there's guards on the new memory
accesses/array derefs.
I've been seeing that bug too, but it's very intermittent. How did you
get it to trigger reliably enough for a bisect?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists