[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241024113201.GA30270@willie-the-truck>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 12:32:02 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@...amperecomputing.com>
Cc: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf/dwc_pcie: Load DesignWare PCIe PMU driver
automatically on Ampere SoCs
On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 11:18:23PM +0000, Ilkka Koskinen wrote:
> Load DesignWare PCIe PMU driver automatically if the system has a PCI
> bridge by Ampere.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@...amperecomputing.com>
> ---
> drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c
> index 3581d916d851..d752168733cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c
> @@ -782,6 +782,16 @@ static void __exit dwc_pcie_pmu_exit(void)
> module_init(dwc_pcie_pmu_init);
> module_exit(dwc_pcie_pmu_exit);
>
> +static const struct pci_device_id dwc_pcie_pmu_table[] = {
> + {
> + PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMPERE, PCI_ANY_ID),
> + .class = PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI_NORMAL,
> + .class_mask = ~0,
> + },
> + { }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, dwc_pcie_pmu_table);
Hmm, won't this only work if the driver is modular? Should we be calling
pci_register_driver() for the builtin case?
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists