[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <216c62ae-04ae-4eb9-8344-9e5de2efdd14@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 13:59:41 +0200
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Friday Yang (杨阳) <Friday.Yang@...iatek.com>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzk@...nel.org" <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: "p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yong Wu (吴勇) <Yong.Wu@...iatek.com>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: memory: mediatek: Add smi-sub-common
property for reset
Il 24/10/24 03:28, Friday Yang (杨阳) ha scritto:
> On Wed, 2024-08-21 at 10:55 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>
>> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
>> you have verified the sender or the content.
>> On 21/08/2024 10:26, friday.yang wrote:
>>> On the MediaTek platform, some SMI LARBs are directly linked to SMI
>>> common. While some SMI LARBs are linked to SMI sub common, then SMI
>>> sub common is linked to SMI common. Add 'mediatek,smi-sub-comm' and
>>> 'mediatek,smi-sub-comm-in-portid' properties here. The SMI reset
>>> driver could query which port of the SMI sub common the current
>> LARB
>>> is linked to through the two properties. The hardware block diagram
>>> could be described as below.
>>>
>>> SMI Common(Smart Multimedia Interface Common)
>>> |
>>> +----------------+-------
>>> | |
>>> | |
>>> | |
>>> | |
>>> | |
>>> larb0 SMI Sub Common
>>> | | |
>>> larb1 larb2 larb3
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: friday.yang <friday.yang@...iatek.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../mediatek,smi-common.yaml | 2 ++
>>> .../memory-controllers/mediatek,smi-larb.yaml | 22
>> +++++++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-
>> controllers/mediatek,smi-common.yaml
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/mediatek,smi-
>> common.yaml
>>> index 2f36ac23604c..4392d349878c 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-
>> controllers/mediatek,smi-common.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-
>> controllers/mediatek,smi-common.yaml
>>> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ properties:
>>> - mediatek,mt8186-smi-common
>>> - mediatek,mt8188-smi-common-vdo
>>> - mediatek,mt8188-smi-common-vpp
>>> + - mediatek,mt8188-smi-sub-common
>>> - mediatek,mt8192-smi-common
>>> - mediatek,mt8195-smi-common-vdo
>>> - mediatek,mt8195-smi-common-vpp
>>> @@ -107,6 +108,7 @@ allOf:
>>> compatible:
>>> contains:
>>> enum:
>>> + - mediatek,mt8188-smi-sub-common
>>> - mediatek,mt8195-smi-sub-common
>>> then:
>>> required:
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-
>> controllers/mediatek,smi-larb.yaml
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/mediatek,smi-
>> larb.yaml
>>> index 2381660b324c..5f162bb360db 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-
>> controllers/mediatek,smi-larb.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-
>> controllers/mediatek,smi-larb.yaml
>>> @@ -69,6 +69,16 @@ properties:
>>> description: the hardware id of this larb. It's only required
>> when this
>>> hardware id is not consecutive from its M4U point of view.
>>>
>>> + mediatek,smi-sub-comm:
>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
>>> + description: a phandle of smi_sub_common that the larb is
>> linked to.
>>
>> Why do you have to smi phandle properties per each node?
>>
>
> As shown in the picture from the commit message, we have multipule smi-
> sub-common, each SMI larb may link to one of the smi-sub-common. So we
> need the 'mediatek,smi-sub-comm' to describe which smi-sub-common the
> larb is linked to.
> In next version, I will add two smi-sub-common to the diagram in the
> commit message.
>
>>> +
>>> + mediatek,smi-sub-comm-in-portid:
>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>>> + minimum: 0
>>> + maximum: 7
>>> + description: which port of smi_sub_common that the larb is
>> linked to.
>>
>> Merge it into phandle.
>>
>
> Just confirm,
> Do you mean merge these two into one property, like:
> mediatek,smi-sub-comm = <&phandle port-id>;
>
>>> +
>>> required:
>>> - compatible
>>> - reg
>>> @@ -125,6 +135,18 @@ allOf:
>>> required:
>>> - mediatek,larb-id
>>>
>>> + - if:
>>> + properties:
>>> + compatible:
>>> + contains:
>>> + enum:
>>> + - mediatek,mt8188-smi-larb
>>> +
>>> + then:
>>> + required:
>>> + - mediatek,smi-sub-comm
>>> + - mediatek,smi-sub-comm-in-portid
>>> +
>>
>> and add it to the example (since you claim it is valid for every
>> device).
>>
It's valid only for the Local Arbiters that have a sub-common port, which anyway
are only the ones that are used by CAMSYS if I'm not wrong....
Regardless of that, not all of the mt8188-smi-larb *require* smi-sub-comm.
Besides, if the larb is anyway already linked to a sub-common, can't we just grab
that from walking back?
Or is this property's purpose to actually add a link to a sub-common?
Regards,
Angelo
>
> OK, I will add this to the example.
>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists