lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ECD0CA58-2C3B-48F3-AF12-95E37CB0FC48@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 15:48:26 +0200
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@...cle.com>
CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
 Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
 James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
 Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
 Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
 Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
 Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
 David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
 "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
 "kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev" <kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>,
 "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
 Francesco Lavra <francescolavra.fl@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/6] arm64: Use SYSTEM_OFF2 PSCI call to power off for hibernate

On 24 October 2024 14:54:41 CEST, Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@...cle.com> wrote:
>Perhaps spec. F.b. could be accommodated by first invoking SYSTEM_OFF2 with
>PSCI_1_3_OFF_TYPE_HIBERNATE_OFF and checking its return value in case of a
>fallback to an invocation with 0x0 ?

I wasn't aware there was any point. Are there any hypervisors which actually implemented it that way? Amazon Linux and Ubuntu guests already just use zero.

We could add it later if such a hypervisor (now in violation of F.b) turns up, I suppose?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ