[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84v7xg2rb2.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:31:05 +0206
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Jiri Slaby
<jirislaby@...nel.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Sergey Senozhatsky
<senozhatsky@...omium.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Thomas
Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Esben Haabendal <esben@...nix.com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Florian
Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>, Broadcom internal kernel review
list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>, "Paul E. McKenney"
<paulmck@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Stefan Wahren
<wahrenst@....net>, Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>, Kevin
Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, Markus Schneider-Pargmann
<msp@...libre.com>, Ronald Wahl <ronald.wahl@...itan.com>, Udit Kumar
<u-kumar1@...com>, Griffin Kroah-Hartman <griffin@...ah.com>, Rengarajan S
<rengarajan.s@...rochip.com>, Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@...bus.com>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tty-next v3 4/6] serial: 8250: Specify console context
for rs485_start/stop_tx
On 2024-10-25, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>> Add an argument @in_con to the rs485_start/stop_tx() callbacks
>> to specify if they are being called from console write. If so,
>> the callbacks will not handle interrupt disabling/enabling.
>
> toggling ?
>
>> For all call sites other than console write, there is no
>> functional change.
>
> So, why not call the parameter better to emphasize that it's about IRQ
> toggling? bool toggle_irq ?
Currently there are only 2 users:
serial8250_em485_stop_tx()
bcm2835aux_rs485_stop_tx()
The first one toggles the IER bits, the second one does not. I figured
it would make more sense to specify the context rather than what needs
to be done and let the 8250-variant decide what it should do.
But I have no problems renaming it to toggle_irq. It is an 8250-specific
callback with few users. And really the IER bits is the only reason that
the argument even needs to exist.
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists