[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <172986803684.1442.5968133345148771294.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 14:53:56 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Anna-Maria Behnsen" <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: timers/core] timekeeping: Move shadow_timekeeper into tk_core
The following commit has been merged into the timers/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: d517700c6fef3fab9c5d36c8065dcc385b70ce7c
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/d517700c6fef3fab9c5d36c8065dcc385b70ce7c
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 10:29:00 +02:00
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitterDate: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:41:11 +02:00
timekeeping: Move shadow_timekeeper into tk_core
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
tk_core requires shadow_timekeeper to allow timekeeping_advance() updating
without holding the timekeeper sequence count write locked. This allows the
readers to make progress up to the actual update where the shadow
timekeeper is copied over to the real timekeeper.
As long as there is only a single timekeeper, having them separate is
fine. But when the timekeeper infrastructure will be reused for per ptp
clock timekeepers, shadow_timekeeper needs to be part of tk_core.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-7-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
---
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index cfb718d..848d2b1 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -50,11 +50,11 @@ DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(timekeeper_lock);
static struct {
seqcount_raw_spinlock_t seq;
struct timekeeper timekeeper;
+ struct timekeeper shadow_timekeeper;
} tk_core ____cacheline_aligned = {
.seq = SEQCNT_RAW_SPINLOCK_ZERO(tk_core.seq, &timekeeper_lock),
};
-static struct timekeeper shadow_timekeeper;
/* flag for if timekeeping is suspended */
int __read_mostly timekeeping_suspended;
@@ -795,8 +795,7 @@ static void timekeeping_update(struct timekeeper *tk, unsigned int action)
* timekeeper structure on the next update with stale data
*/
if (action & TK_MIRROR)
- memcpy(&shadow_timekeeper, &tk_core.timekeeper,
- sizeof(tk_core.timekeeper));
+ memcpy(&tk_core.shadow_timekeeper, &tk_core.timekeeper, sizeof(tk_core.timekeeper));
}
/**
@@ -2305,8 +2304,8 @@ static u64 logarithmic_accumulation(struct timekeeper *tk, u64 offset,
*/
static bool timekeeping_advance(enum timekeeping_adv_mode mode)
{
+ struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.shadow_timekeeper;
struct timekeeper *real_tk = &tk_core.timekeeper;
- struct timekeeper *tk = &shadow_timekeeper;
unsigned int clock_set = 0;
int shift = 0, maxshift;
u64 offset;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists