[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <282ba5d4-cdad-a6f4-8ee0-1936c532dbc5@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 18:55:38 +0300 (EEST)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@...hat.com>
cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>,
Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>,
Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@...el.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
Arnaud Ebalard <arno@...isbad.org>, Srujana Challa <schalla@...vell.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@...el.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>, Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Allen Hubbe <allenbh@...il.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Jie Wang <jie.wang@...el.com>, Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@...ux.intel.com>,
Adam Guerin <adam.guerin@...el.com>,
Shashank Gupta <shashank.gupta@...el.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@...vell.com>,
Nithin Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@...vell.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>,
Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@...el.com>,
Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@...el.com>,
Yedidya Benshimol <yedidya.ben.shimol@...el.com>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, qat-linux@...el.com,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
ntb@...ts.linux.dev, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] ata: ahci: Replace deprecated PCI functions
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> pcim_iomap_regions_request_all() and pcim_iomap_table() have been
> deprecated by the PCI subsystem in commit e354bb84a4c1 ("PCI: Deprecate
> pcim_iomap_table(), pcim_iomap_regions_request_all()").
>
> Replace these functions with their successors, pcim_iomap() and
> pcim_request_all_regions().
>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@...hat.com>
> Acked-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/ata/acard-ahci.c | 6 ++++--
> drivers/ata/ahci.c | 6 ++++--
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/acard-ahci.c b/drivers/ata/acard-ahci.c
> index 547f56341705..3999305b5356 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/acard-ahci.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/acard-ahci.c
> @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ static int acard_ahci_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id
> /* AHCI controllers often implement SFF compatible interface.
> * Grab all PCI BARs just in case.
> */
> - rc = pcim_iomap_regions_request_all(pdev, 1 << AHCI_PCI_BAR, DRV_NAME);
> + rc = pcim_request_all_regions(pdev, DRV_NAME);
> if (rc == -EBUSY)
> pcim_pin_device(pdev);
> if (rc)
> @@ -386,7 +386,9 @@ static int acard_ahci_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id
> if (!(hpriv->flags & AHCI_HFLAG_NO_MSI))
> pci_enable_msi(pdev);
>
> - hpriv->mmio = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[AHCI_PCI_BAR];
> + hpriv->mmio = pcim_iomap(pdev, AHCI_PCI_BAR, 0);
> + if (!hpriv->mmio)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> /* save initial config */
> ahci_save_initial_config(&pdev->dev, hpriv);
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> index 45f63b09828a..2043dfb52ae8 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> @@ -1869,7 +1869,7 @@ static int ahci_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> /* AHCI controllers often implement SFF compatible interface.
> * Grab all PCI BARs just in case.
> */
> - rc = pcim_iomap_regions_request_all(pdev, 1 << ahci_pci_bar, DRV_NAME);
> + rc = pcim_request_all_regions(pdev, DRV_NAME);
> if (rc == -EBUSY)
> pcim_pin_device(pdev);
> if (rc)
> @@ -1893,7 +1893,9 @@ static int ahci_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> if (ahci_sb600_enable_64bit(pdev))
> hpriv->flags &= ~AHCI_HFLAG_32BIT_ONLY;
>
> - hpriv->mmio = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[ahci_pci_bar];
> + hpriv->mmio = pcim_iomap(pdev, ahci_pci_bar, 0);
> + if (!hpriv->mmio)
> + return -ENOMEM;
Hi,
I've probably lost the big picture somewhere and the coverletter wasn't
helpful focusing only the most immediate goal of getting rid of the
deprecated function.
These seem to only pcim_iomap() a single BAR. So my question is, what is
the reason for using pcim_request_all_regions() and not
pcim_request_region() as mentioned in the commit message of the commit
e354bb84a4c1 ("PCI: Deprecate pcim_iomap_table(),
pcim_iomap_regions_request_all()")?
I understand it's strictly not wrong to use pcim_request_all_regions()
but I'm just trying to understand the logic behind the selection.
I'm sorry if this is a stupid question, it's just what I couldn't figure
out on my own while trying to review these patches.
(I admit not reading all the related discussions in the earlier versions.)
--
i.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists