lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
 <PN3P287MB1829F71AC066E73FF25FFA658B4F2@PN3P287MB1829.INDP287.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 18:01:53 +0000
From: Tarang Raval <tarang.raval@...iconsignals.io>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
CC: "sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com" <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
	"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>, "linux-media@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: mt9p031: Refactor format handling for different
 sensor models

Hi Laurent,

Thanks for your suggestion.

>> +static const struct mt9p031_model_info mt9p031_models[] = {
>> +     {.code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG12_1X12}, /* mt9p006  */
>
>There should be spaces after { and before }

okay.

>> +     {.code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG12_1X12}, /* mt9p031  */
>
>You can use the same entry for both the MT9P006 and MT9P031 as they
>don't need to be deferentiated.

sure, will do 

>> +     {.code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_Y12_1X12},     /* mt9p031m */
>> +};
>> +

[...]

>>  static const struct i2c_device_id mt9p031_id[] = {
>> -     { "mt9p006", MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG12_1X12 },
>> -     { "mt9p031", MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG12_1X12 },
>> -     { "mt9p031m", MEDIA_BUS_FMT_Y12_1X12 },
>> +     { "mt9p006", 0 },
>> +     { "mt9p031", 1 },
>> +     { "mt9p031m", 2 },
>>       { /* sentinel */ }
>>  };
>>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, mt9p031_id);
>
>I think we can drop mt9p031_id. I'll send a patch series to do so.

okay 

>>  static const struct of_device_id mt9p031_of_match[] = {
>> -     { .compatible = "aptina,mt9p006", .data = (void *)MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG12_1X12 },
>> -     { .compatible = "aptina,mt9p031", .data = (void *)MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG12_1X12 },
>> -     { .compatible = "aptina,mt9p031m", .data = (void *)MEDIA_BUS_FMT_Y12_1X12 },
>> +     { .compatible = "aptina,mt9p006", .data = (void *)0 },
>> +     { .compatible = "aptina,mt9p031", .data = (void *)1 },
>> +     { .compatible = "aptina,mt9p031m", .data = (void *)2 },
>
>Let's avoid magic values. You can write
>
>       { .compatible = "aptina,mt9p006", .data = &mt9p031_models[0] },
>        { .compatible = "aptina,mt9p031", .data = &mt9p031_models[0] },
>       { .compatible = "aptina,mt9p031m", .data = &mt9p031_models[1] },
>
>but it may be even more readable to introduce a
>
>enum mt9p031_model {
>       MT9P031_MODEL_BAYER,
>        MT9P031_MODEL_MONO,
>};

makes sense.

>static const struct mt9p031_model_info mt9p031_models[] = {
>       [MT9P031_MODEL_BAYER] = {
>                .code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG12_1X12,
>        },
>        [MT9P031_MODEL_MONO] = {
>                .code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_Y12_1X12,
>        },
>};
>
>static const struct of_device_id mt9p031_of_match[] = {
>        {
>                .compatible = "aptina,mt9p006",
>                .data = &mt9p031_models[MT9P031_MODEL_BAYER],
>       }, {
>                .compatible = "aptina,mt9p031",
>               .data = &mt9p031_models[MT9P031_MODEL_BAYER],
>        }, {
>                .compatible = "aptina,mt9p031m",
>                .data = &mt9p031_models[MEDIA_BUS_FMT_Y12_1X12],
>        },
>        { /* sentinel */ }
>};

I will update as per your suggestions and also drop mt9p031_id.

Best Regards,
Tarang

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ