[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241025182149.500274-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 14:21:49 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
syzbot+b390c8062d8387b6272a@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Michael Jeanson <mjeanson@...icios.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Jordan Rife <jrife@...gle.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v1] tracing: Fix syscall tracepoint use-after-free
The grace period used internally within tracepoint.c:release_probes()
uses call_rcu() to batch waiting for quiescence of old probe arrays,
rather than using the tracepoint_synchronize_unregister() which blocks
while waiting for quiescence.
With the introduction of faultable syscall tracepoints, this causes
use-after-free issues reproduced with syzkaller.
Fix this by introducing tracepoint_call_rcu(), which uses the
appropriate call_rcu() or call_rcu_tasks_trace() before invoking the
rcu_free_old_probes callback.
Use tracepoint_call_rcu() in bpf_link_free() for raw tracepoints as
well, which has the same problem for syscall tracepoints.
Reported-by: syzbot+b390c8062d8387b6272a@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: a363d27cdbc2 ("tracing: Allow system call tracepoints to handle page faults")
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Michael Jeanson <mjeanson@...icios.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc: Jordan Rife <jrife@...gle.com>
---
Changes since v0:
- Introduce tracepoint_call_rcu(),
- Fix bpf_link_free() use of call_rcu as well.
---
include/linux/tracepoint.h | 9 +++++++++
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
kernel/tracepoint.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
index 0dc67fad706c..45025d6b2dd6 100644
--- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h
+++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
@@ -104,6 +104,8 @@ void for_each_tracepoint_in_module(struct module *mod,
* tracepoint_synchronize_unregister must be called between the last tracepoint
* probe unregistration and the end of module exit to make sure there is no
* caller executing a probe when it is freed.
+ * An alternative to tracepoint_synchronize_unregister() is to use
+ * tracepoint_call_rcu() for batched reclaim.
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS
static inline void tracepoint_synchronize_unregister(void)
@@ -111,9 +113,16 @@ static inline void tracepoint_synchronize_unregister(void)
synchronize_rcu_tasks_trace();
synchronize_rcu();
}
+
+void tracepoint_call_rcu(struct tracepoint *tp, struct rcu_head *head,
+ void (*callback)(struct rcu_head *head));
+
#else
static inline void tracepoint_synchronize_unregister(void)
{ }
+static inline void tracepoint_call_rcu(struct tracepoint *tp, struct rcu_head *head,
+ void (*callback)(struct rcu_head *head))
+{ }
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 59de664e580d..1191dc1d4206 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -3006,14 +3006,21 @@ static void bpf_link_free(struct bpf_link *link)
bpf_prog_put(link->prog);
}
if (ops->dealloc_deferred) {
- /* schedule BPF link deallocation; if underlying BPF program
- * is sleepable, we need to first wait for RCU tasks trace
- * sync, then go through "classic" RCU grace period
- */
- if (sleepable)
- call_rcu_tasks_trace(&link->rcu, bpf_link_defer_dealloc_mult_rcu_gp);
- else
- call_rcu(&link->rcu, bpf_link_defer_dealloc_rcu_gp);
+ if (link->type == BPF_LINK_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT) {
+ struct bpf_raw_tp_link *raw_tp =
+ container_of(link, struct bpf_raw_tp_link, link);
+
+ tracepoint_call_rcu(raw_tp->btp->tp, &link->rcu, bpf_link_defer_dealloc_rcu_gp);
+ } else {
+ /* schedule BPF link deallocation; if underlying BPF program
+ * is sleepable, we need to first wait for RCU tasks trace
+ * sync, then go through "classic" RCU grace period
+ */
+ if (sleepable)
+ call_rcu_tasks_trace(&link->rcu, bpf_link_defer_dealloc_mult_rcu_gp);
+ else
+ call_rcu(&link->rcu, bpf_link_defer_dealloc_rcu_gp);
+ }
} else if (ops->dealloc)
ops->dealloc(link);
}
diff --git a/kernel/tracepoint.c b/kernel/tracepoint.c
index 6474e2cf22c9..ef60c5484eda 100644
--- a/kernel/tracepoint.c
+++ b/kernel/tracepoint.c
@@ -106,13 +106,27 @@ static void rcu_free_old_probes(struct rcu_head *head)
kfree(container_of(head, struct tp_probes, rcu));
}
-static inline void release_probes(struct tracepoint_func *old)
+static bool tracepoint_is_syscall(struct tracepoint *tp)
+{
+ return !strcmp(tp->name, "sys_enter") || !strcmp(tp->name, "sys_exit");
+}
+
+void tracepoint_call_rcu(struct tracepoint *tp, struct rcu_head *head,
+ void (*callback)(struct rcu_head *head))
+{
+ if (tracepoint_is_syscall(tp))
+ call_rcu_tasks_trace(head, callback);
+ else
+ call_rcu(head, callback);
+}
+
+static inline void release_probes(struct tracepoint *tp, struct tracepoint_func *old)
{
if (old) {
struct tp_probes *tp_probes = container_of(old,
struct tp_probes, probes[0]);
- call_rcu(&tp_probes->rcu, rcu_free_old_probes);
+ tracepoint_call_rcu(tp, &tp_probes->rcu, rcu_free_old_probes);
}
}
@@ -334,7 +348,7 @@ static int tracepoint_add_func(struct tracepoint *tp,
break;
}
- release_probes(old);
+ release_probes(tp, old);
return 0;
}
@@ -406,7 +420,7 @@ static int tracepoint_remove_func(struct tracepoint *tp,
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
break;
}
- release_probes(old);
+ release_probes(tp, old);
return 0;
}
--
2.39.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists