lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87plnn4yky.ffs@tglx>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 00:17:17 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Aleksandar Rikalo <arikalo@...il.com>, Thomas Bogendoerfer
 <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc: Aleksandar Rikalo <arikalo@...il.com>, Chao-ying Fu <cfu@...ecomp.com>,
 Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, Geert Uytterhoeven
 <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Greg Ungerer <gerg@...nel.org>, Hauke Mehrtens
 <hauke@...ke-m.de>, Ilya Lipnitskiy <ilya.lipnitskiy@...il.com>, Jiaxun
 Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Paul Burton
 <paulburton@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Serge
 Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>, Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
 Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 02/12] irqchip/mips-gic: Support multi-cluster in
 for_each_online_cpu_gic()

On Sat, Oct 19 2024 at 09:10, Aleksandar Rikalo wrote:

> From: Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>
>
> Use CM's GCR_CL_REDIRECT register to access registers in remote clusters,
> so users of gic_with_each_online_cpu() gain support for multi-cluster with
> no further changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Chao-ying Fu <cfu@...ecomp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dragan Mladjenovic <dragan.mladjenovic@...mia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aleksandar Rikalo <arikalo@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

I told you before that you cannot put my Signed-off-by on this. See

  https://lore.kernel.org/all/8734oguovn.ffs@tglx

#1 Please consult your lawyer if you can't figure out what to do here after
   reading through Documentation/process/*

#2 Just for the record, I seriously doubt that the Signed-off-by chain
   above the bogus entry you added for me is valid at all. See #1

Thanks,

        tglx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ