[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9377619cb46809575611951b9e77a4d8b2bbdf3d.camel@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 22:39:50 +0000
From: "Colberg, Peter" <peter.colberg@...el.com>
To: "yilun.xu@...ux.intel.com" <yilun.xu@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "Xu, Yilun" <yilun.xu@...el.com>, "linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org>, "mdf@...nel.org" <mdf@...nel.org>, "Wu, Hao"
<hao.wu@...el.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "russ.weight@...ux.dev"
<russ.weight@...ux.dev>, "Pagani, Marco" <marpagan@...hat.com>,
"trix@...hat.com" <trix@...hat.com>, "matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com"
<matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] fpga: dfl: omit unneeded null pointer check from
{afu,fme}_open()
On Tue, 2024-09-24 at 14:28 +0800, Xu Yilun wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 04:34:23PM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote:
> > The feature platform device is guaranteed to have an associated platform
> > data. Refactor dfl_fpga_inode_to_feature_dev_data() to directly return
> > the platform data and retrieve the device from the data.
>
> The code is good. But please elaborate on the purpose of these
> intermediate change.
>
> Thanks,
> Yilun
This has been done in the revised patch "fpga: dfl: return platform
data from dfl_fpga_inode_to_feature_dev_data()".
Thanks,
Peter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists