[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cdc3a34a-9533-4f0c-bd2a-3796aeed161c@paulmck-laptop>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 15:55:46 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] rcu: Unlock correctly in rcu_dump_cpu_stacks()
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 10:06:43AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The unlock needs to be outside the } close curly braces for this if
> statement. Otherwise it leads to a deadlock.
>
> Fixes: 744e87210b1a ("rcu: Finer-grained grace-period-end checks in rcu_dump_cpu_stacks()")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Good catch!
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
This is a regression from this past merge window, if I am keeping track.
So it is a candidate for going in before the next merge window opens.
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
> index 8994391b95c7..925fcdad5dea 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
> @@ -357,8 +357,8 @@ static void rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(unsigned long gp_seq)
> pr_err("Offline CPU %d blocking current GP.\n", cpu);
> else
> dump_cpu_task(cpu);
> - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
> }
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
> }
> printk_deferred_exit();
> }
> --
> 2.45.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists