linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Add test for trie_get_next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cf3f3926-7684-4e0d-b8cc-5514ff71647b@iogearbox.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 14:03:01 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Hou Tao <houtao@...weicloud.com>, Byeonguk Jeong <jungbu2855@...il.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
 Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
 LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Add test for trie_get_next_key()

On 10/25/24 1:54 PM, Hou Tao wrote:
> On 10/25/2024 6:26 AM, Byeonguk Jeong wrote:
>>
>> Okay, I will submit them in a series of patches. Btw, ASSERT_* macros
>> are not defined for map_tests. Should I add the definitions for them,
>> or just go with CHECK?
> 
> For tests in map_tests, I think using CHECK() will be fine.

Given there is no alternative infra, agree. Would be nice to convert this
over at some point.

Best,
Daniel