[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <535af173992948db675029bc33a7877cb9e75275.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 14:24:42 +0200
From: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, Uwe
Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>
Cc: Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, Lars-Peter Clausen
<lars@...afoo.de>, David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>, Martin Sperl
<kernel@...tin.sperl.org>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v4 07/15] spi: add offload TX/RX streaming APIs
On Wed, 2024-10-23 at 15:59 -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> Most configuration of SPI offloads is handled opaquely using the offload
> pointer that is passed to the various offload functions. However, there
> are some offload features that need to be controlled on a per transfer
> basis.
>
> This patch adds a flag field to struct spi_transfer to allow specifying
> such features. The first feature to be added is the ability to stream
> data to/from a hardware sink/source rather than using a tx or rx buffer.
> Additional flags can be added in the future as needed.
>
> A flags field is also added to the offload struct for providers to
> indicate which flags are supported. This allows for generic checking of
> offload capabilities during __spi_validate() so that each offload
> provider doesn't have to implement their own validation.
>
> As a first users of this streaming capability, getter functions are
> added to get a DMA channel that is directly connected to the offload.
> Peripheral drivers will use this to get a DMA channel and configure it
> to suit their needs.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
> ---
>
> v4 changes:
> * DMA API's now automatically release DMA channels instead of leaving
> it up to the caller.
>
> v3 changes:
> * Added spi_offload_{tx,rx}_stream_get_dma_chan() functions.
>
> v2 changes:
> * This is also split out from "spi: add core support for controllers with
> offload capabilities".
> * In the previous version, we were using (void *)-1 as a sentinel value
> that could be assigned, e.g. to rx_buf. But this was naive since there
> is core code that would try to dereference this pointer. So instead,
> we've added a new flags field to the spi_transfer structure for this
> sort of thing. This also has the advantage of being able to be used in
> the future for other arbitrary features.
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-offload.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/spi/spi.c | 10 ++++++
> include/linux/spi/spi-offload.h | 24 +++++++++++++
> include/linux/spi/spi.h | 3 ++
> 4 files changed, 113 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-offload.c b/drivers/spi/spi-offload.c
> index 2a1f9587f27a..dd4cb3c2e985 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-offload.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-offload.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/cleanup.h>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/dmaengine.h>
> #include <linux/export.h>
> #include <linux/list.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> @@ -282,6 +283,81 @@ void spi_offload_trigger_disable(struct spi_offload *offload,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_offload_trigger_disable);
>
> +static void spi_offload_release_dma_chan(void *chan)
> +{
> + dma_release_channel(chan);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * spi_offload_tx_stream_request_dma_chan_info - Get the DMA channel info for the
> TX stream
> + * @spi: SPI device
> + * @id: Function ID if SPI device uses more than one offload or NULL.
> + *
> + * This is the DMA channel that will provide data to transfers that use the
> + * %SPI_OFFLOAD_XFER_TX_STREAM offload flag.
> + *
> + * The caller is responsible for calling spi_offload_free_dma_chan_info() on the
> + * returned pointer.
I guess the above does not make sense now. But I would still document (just to really
make it explicit) that the lifetime of the DMA channel is effectively being handed
over to the consumer.
- Nuno Sá
Powered by blists - more mailing lists