[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1b69a2bb-90cc-482f-8107-37be61ea94d6@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 14:37:37 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Markuss Broks <markuss.broks@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Tomasz Figa
<tomasz.figa@...il.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Ivaylo Ivanov <ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@...il.com>,
Maksym Holovach <nergzd@...gzd723.xyz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] dt-bindings: pinctrl: samsung: Add compatible
for exynos9810-wakeup-eint
On 25/10/2024 13:24, Markuss Broks wrote:
> Add the compatible for Samsung Exynos9810 pinctrl eint block to the schema.
All your commit msgs state obvious: duplicate subject and contents of
the patch. We see this, it's not helpful. Instead rather explain the
hardware and differences, e.g. no interrupts here?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists