[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zxx4ep78tsbeWPVM@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 14:04:58 +0900
From: Byeonguk Jeong <jungbu2855@...il.com>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Hou Tao <houtao@...weicloud.com>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for trie_get_next_key()
Add a test for out-of-bounds write in trie_get_next_key() when a full
path from root to leaf exists and bpf_map_get_next_key() is called
with the leaf node. It may crashes the kernel on failure, so please
run in a VM.
Signed-off-by: Byeonguk Jeong <jungbu2855@...il.com>
---
v1 -> v2:
- Fixed a build error.
- Removed unnecessary comments about crash-on-failure warning.
- Fix a variable to be initialized before using it.
---
.../bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_get_next_key.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 109 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_get_next_key.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_get_next_key.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_get_next_key.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0ba015686492
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_get_next_key.c
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#define _GNU_SOURCE
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdbool.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <pthread.h>
+
+#include <bpf/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/libbpf.h>
+
+#include <test_maps.h>
+
+struct test_lpm_key {
+ __u32 prefix;
+ __u32 data;
+};
+
+struct get_next_key_ctx {
+ struct test_lpm_key key;
+ bool start;
+ bool stop;
+ int map_fd;
+ int loop;
+};
+
+static void *get_next_key_fn(void *arg)
+{
+ struct get_next_key_ctx *ctx = arg;
+ struct test_lpm_key next_key;
+ int i = 0;
+
+ while (!ctx->start)
+ usleep(1);
+
+ while (!ctx->stop && i++ < ctx->loop)
+ bpf_map_get_next_key(ctx->map_fd, &ctx->key, &next_key);
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static void abort_get_next_key(struct get_next_key_ctx *ctx, pthread_t *tids,
+ unsigned int nr)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ ctx->stop = true;
+ ctx->start = true;
+ for (i = 0; i < nr; i++)
+ pthread_join(tids[i], NULL);
+}
+
+/* This test aims to prevent regression of future. As long as the kernel does
+ * not panic, it is considered as success.
+ */
+void test_lpm_trie_map_get_next_key(void)
+{
+#define MAX_NR_THREADS 8
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_create_opts, create_opts,
+ .map_flags = BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
+ struct test_lpm_key key = {};
+ __u32 val = 0;
+ int map_fd;
+ const __u32 max_prefixlen = 8 * (sizeof(key) - sizeof(key.prefix));
+ const __u32 max_entries = max_prefixlen + 1;
+ unsigned int i, nr = MAX_NR_THREADS, loop = 65536;
+ pthread_t tids[MAX_NR_THREADS];
+ struct get_next_key_ctx ctx;
+ int err;
+
+ map_fd = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_LPM_TRIE, "lpm_trie_map",
+ sizeof(struct test_lpm_key), sizeof(__u32),
+ max_entries, &create_opts);
+ CHECK(map_fd == -1, "bpf_map_create()", "error:%s\n",
+ strerror(errno));
+
+ for (i = 0; i <= max_prefixlen; i++) {
+ key.prefix = i;
+ err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &key, &val, BPF_ANY);
+ CHECK(err, "bpf_map_update_elem()", "error:%s\n",
+ strerror(errno));
+ }
+
+ ctx.start = false;
+ ctx.stop = false;
+ ctx.map_fd = map_fd;
+ ctx.loop = loop;
+ memcpy(&ctx.key, &key, sizeof(key));
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
+ err = pthread_create(&tids[i], NULL, get_next_key_fn, &ctx);
+ if (err) {
+ abort_get_next_key(&ctx, tids, i);
+ CHECK(err, "pthread_create", "error %d\n", err);
+ }
+ }
+
+ ctx.start = true;
+ for (i = 0; i < nr; i++)
+ pthread_join(tids[i], NULL);
+
+ printf("%s:PASS\n", __func__);
+
+ close(map_fd);
+}
--
2.43.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists