linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Use str_yes_no() and str_no

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <EED2116F-58F5-4409-8732-6A15C364C085@linux.dev>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 17:14:40 +0200
From: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
 Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
 Gou Hao <gouhao@...ontech.com>,
 Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
 Abhishek Chauhan <quic_abchauha@...cinc.com>,
 Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Use str_yes_no() and str_no_yes() helper
 functions

On 26. Oct 2024, at 16:54, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> proto->slab : "yes" : "no" would arguably be even easier than the
> current form, and a conversion could similarly use str_yes_no.

Happy to change this and submit a v2.