| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAOUHufYgvcAvbGv_3rDhj_NX-ND-TMX_nyF7ZHQRW8ZxniObOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 21:58:45 -0600
From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Meta kernel team <kernel-team@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 6/6] memcg-v1: remove memcg move locking code
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 7:23 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> The memcg v1's charge move feature has been deprecated. All the places
> using the memcg move lock, have stopped using it as they don't need the
> protection any more. Let's proceed to remove all the locking code
> related to charge moving.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
> ---
>
> Changes since RFC:
> - Remove the memcg move locking in separate patches.
>
> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 54 -------------------------
> mm/filemap.c | 1 -
> mm/memcontrol-v1.c | 82 --------------------------------------
> mm/memcontrol.c | 5 ---
> mm/rmap.c | 1 -
> 5 files changed, 143 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 798db70b0a30..932534291ca2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -299,20 +299,10 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
> /* For oom notifier event fd */
> struct list_head oom_notify;
>
> - /* taken only while moving_account > 0 */
> - spinlock_t move_lock;
> - unsigned long move_lock_flags;
> -
> /* Legacy tcp memory accounting */
> bool tcpmem_active;
> int tcpmem_pressure;
>
> - /*
> - * set > 0 if pages under this cgroup are moving to other cgroup.
> - */
> - atomic_t moving_account;
> - struct task_struct *move_lock_task;
> -
> /* List of events which userspace want to receive */
> struct list_head event_list;
> spinlock_t event_list_lock;
> @@ -428,9 +418,7 @@ static inline struct obj_cgroup *__folio_objcg(struct folio *folio)
> *
> * - the folio lock
> * - LRU isolation
> - * - folio_memcg_lock()
> * - exclusive reference
> - * - mem_cgroup_trylock_pages()
> *
> * For a kmem folio a caller should hold an rcu read lock to protect memcg
> * associated with a kmem folio from being released.
> @@ -499,9 +487,7 @@ static inline struct mem_cgroup *folio_memcg_rcu(struct folio *folio)
I think you missed folio_memcg_rcu().
(I don't think workingset_activation() needs it, since its only caller
must hold a refcnt on the folio.)
> *
> * - the folio lock
> * - LRU isolation
> - * - lock_folio_memcg()
> * - exclusive reference
> - * - mem_cgroup_trylock_pages()
> *
> * For a kmem folio a caller should hold an rcu read lock to protect memcg
> * associated with a kmem folio from being released.
> @@ -1873,26 +1859,6 @@ static inline bool task_in_memcg_oom(struct task_struct *p)
> return p->memcg_in_oom;
> }
>
> -void folio_memcg_lock(struct folio *folio);
> -void folio_memcg_unlock(struct folio *folio);
> -
> -/* try to stablize folio_memcg() for all the pages in a memcg */
> -static inline bool mem_cgroup_trylock_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> -{
> - rcu_read_lock();
> -
> - if (mem_cgroup_disabled() || !atomic_read(&memcg->moving_account))
> - return true;
> -
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> - return false;
> -}
> -
> -static inline void mem_cgroup_unlock_pages(void)
> -{
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> -}
> -
> static inline void mem_cgroup_enter_user_fault(void)
> {
> WARN_ON(current->in_user_fault);
> @@ -1914,26 +1880,6 @@ unsigned long memcg1_soft_limit_reclaim(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static inline void folio_memcg_lock(struct folio *folio)
> -{
> -}
> -
> -static inline void folio_memcg_unlock(struct folio *folio)
> -{
> -}
> -
> -static inline bool mem_cgroup_trylock_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> -{
> - /* to match folio_memcg_rcu() */
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - return true;
> -}
> -
> -static inline void mem_cgroup_unlock_pages(void)
> -{
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> -}
> -
> static inline bool task_in_memcg_oom(struct task_struct *p)
> {
> return false;
> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> index 630a1c431ea1..e582a1545d2a 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -119,7 +119,6 @@
> * ->i_pages lock (folio_remove_rmap_pte->set_page_dirty)
> * bdi.wb->list_lock (folio_remove_rmap_pte->set_page_dirty)
> * ->inode->i_lock (folio_remove_rmap_pte->set_page_dirty)
> - * ->memcg->move_lock (folio_remove_rmap_pte->folio_memcg_lock)
> * bdi.wb->list_lock (zap_pte_range->set_page_dirty)
> * ->inode->i_lock (zap_pte_range->set_page_dirty)
> * ->private_lock (zap_pte_range->block_dirty_folio)
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol-v1.c b/mm/memcontrol-v1.c
> index 9c0fba8c8a83..539ceefa9d2d 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol-v1.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol-v1.c
> @@ -401,87 +401,6 @@ unsigned long memcg1_soft_limit_reclaim(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
> return nr_reclaimed;
> }
>
> -/**
> - * folio_memcg_lock - Bind a folio to its memcg.
> - * @folio: The folio.
> - *
> - * This function prevents unlocked LRU folios from being moved to
> - * another cgroup.
> - *
> - * It ensures lifetime of the bound memcg. The caller is responsible
> - * for the lifetime of the folio.
> - */
> -void folio_memcg_lock(struct folio *folio)
> -{
> - struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> - unsigned long flags;
> -
> - /*
> - * The RCU lock is held throughout the transaction. The fast
> - * path can get away without acquiring the memcg->move_lock
> - * because page moving starts with an RCU grace period.
> - */
> - rcu_read_lock();
> -
> - if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> - return;
> -again:
> - memcg = folio_memcg(folio);
> - if (unlikely(!memcg))
> - return;
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
> - local_irq_save(flags);
> - might_lock(&memcg->move_lock);
> - local_irq_restore(flags);
> -#endif
> -
> - if (atomic_read(&memcg->moving_account) <= 0)
> - return;
> -
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&memcg->move_lock, flags);
> - if (memcg != folio_memcg(folio)) {
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&memcg->move_lock, flags);
> - goto again;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * When charge migration first begins, we can have multiple
> - * critical sections holding the fast-path RCU lock and one
> - * holding the slowpath move_lock. Track the task who has the
> - * move_lock for folio_memcg_unlock().
> - */
> - memcg->move_lock_task = current;
> - memcg->move_lock_flags = flags;
> -}
> -
> -static void __folio_memcg_unlock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> -{
> - if (memcg && memcg->move_lock_task == current) {
> - unsigned long flags = memcg->move_lock_flags;
> -
> - memcg->move_lock_task = NULL;
> - memcg->move_lock_flags = 0;
> -
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&memcg->move_lock, flags);
> - }
> -
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> -}
> -
> -/**
> - * folio_memcg_unlock - Release the binding between a folio and its memcg.
> - * @folio: The folio.
> - *
> - * This releases the binding created by folio_memcg_lock(). This does
> - * not change the accounting of this folio to its memcg, but it does
> - * permit others to change it.
> - */
> -void folio_memcg_unlock(struct folio *folio)
> -{
> - __folio_memcg_unlock(folio_memcg(folio));
> -}
> -
> static u64 mem_cgroup_move_charge_read(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css,
> struct cftype *cft)
> {
> @@ -1189,7 +1108,6 @@ void memcg1_memcg_init(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> {
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&memcg->oom_notify);
> mutex_init(&memcg->thresholds_lock);
> - spin_lock_init(&memcg->move_lock);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&memcg->event_list);
> spin_lock_init(&memcg->event_list_lock);
> }
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 94279b9c766a..3c223aaeb6af 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1189,7 +1189,6 @@ void lruvec_memcg_debug(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio)
> * These functions are safe to use under any of the following conditions:
> * - folio locked
> * - folio_test_lru false
> - * - folio_memcg_lock()
> * - folio frozen (refcount of 0)
> *
> * Return: The lruvec this folio is on with its lock held.
> @@ -1211,7 +1210,6 @@ struct lruvec *folio_lruvec_lock(struct folio *folio)
> * These functions are safe to use under any of the following conditions:
> * - folio locked
> * - folio_test_lru false
> - * - folio_memcg_lock()
> * - folio frozen (refcount of 0)
> *
> * Return: The lruvec this folio is on with its lock held and interrupts
> @@ -1235,7 +1233,6 @@ struct lruvec *folio_lruvec_lock_irq(struct folio *folio)
> * These functions are safe to use under any of the following conditions:
> * - folio locked
> * - folio_test_lru false
> - * - folio_memcg_lock()
> * - folio frozen (refcount of 0)
> *
> * Return: The lruvec this folio is on with its lock held and interrupts
> @@ -2375,9 +2372,7 @@ static void commit_charge(struct folio *folio, struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> *
> * - the page lock
> * - LRU isolation
> - * - folio_memcg_lock()
> * - exclusive reference
> - * - mem_cgroup_trylock_pages()
> */
> folio->memcg_data = (unsigned long)memcg;
> }
> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> index 4785a693857a..c6c4d4ea29a7 100644
> --- a/mm/rmap.c
> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,6 @@
> * swap_lock (in swap_duplicate, swap_info_get)
> * mmlist_lock (in mmput, drain_mmlist and others)
> * mapping->private_lock (in block_dirty_folio)
> - * folio_lock_memcg move_lock (in block_dirty_folio)
> * i_pages lock (widely used)
> * lruvec->lru_lock (in folio_lruvec_lock_irq)
> * inode->i_lock (in set_page_dirty's __mark_inode_dirty)
> --
> 2.43.5
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists