linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH mm-unstable v2] mm/page_alloc: keep track of free highatomic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20241025212448.b1a9069d71df5b497e1b0190@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 21:24:48 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Link Lin
 <linkl@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-unstable v2] mm/page_alloc: keep track of free
 highatomic

On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 21:36:25 -0600 Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com> wrote:

> OOM kills due to vastly overestimated free highatomic reserves were
> observed:
> 
>   ... invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x100cca(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE), order=0 ...
>   Node 0 Normal free:1482936kB boost:0kB min:410416kB low:739404kB high:1068392kB reserved_highatomic:1073152KB ...
>   Node 0 Normal: 1292*4kB (ME) 1920*8kB (E) 383*16kB (UE) 220*32kB (ME) 340*64kB (E) 2155*128kB (UE) 3243*256kB (UE) 615*512kB (U) 1*1024kB (M) 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 1477408kB

Under what circumstances?

> The second line above shows that the OOM kill was due to the following
> condition:
> 
>   free (1482936kB) - reserved_highatomic (1073152kB) = 409784KB < min (410416kB)
> 
> And the third line shows there were no free pages in any
> MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC pageblocks, which otherwise would show up as type
> 'H'. Therefore __zone_watermark_unusable_free() underestimated the
> usable free memory by over 1GB, which resulted in the unnecessary OOM
> kill above.
> 
> The comments in __zone_watermark_unusable_free() warns about the
> potential risk, i.e.,
> 
>   If the caller does not have rights to reserves below the min
>   watermark then subtract the high-atomic reserves. This will
>   over-estimate the size of the atomic reserve but it avoids a search.
> 
> However, it is possible to keep track of free pages in reserved
> highatomic pageblocks with a new per-zone counter nr_free_highatomic
> protected by the zone lock, to avoid a search when calculating the
> usable free memory. And the cost would be minimal, i.e., simple
> arithmetics in the highatomic alloc/free/move paths.

Is a -stable backport needed?

If so, is a Fixes: target identifiable?