[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o7342xkc.ffs@tglx>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 13:58:59 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <ravi@...vas.dk>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, David Vernet
<void@...ifault.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org.com>, Juri Lelli
<juri.lelli@...hat.com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, Steven Rostedt
<rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman
<mgorman@...e.de>, Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar
<mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] sched/ext: Remove sched_fork() hack
On Mon, Oct 28 2024 at 13:30, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> + memset(scx, 0, sizeof(*scx));
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scx->dsq_list.node);
>> RB_CLEAR_NODE(&scx->dsq_priq);
>> scx->sticky_cpu = -1;
>
> Should the "must be the last" comment in include/linux/sched/ext.h also
> be removed?
Oh. Indeed. I missed that one.
Thanks for pointing it out.
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists