linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/3] KVM: VMX: Refactor VMX module init/exit functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6e15578c9c2fd14b9a8fd02fda4df3843267dd13.1730120881.git.kai.huang@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 02:20:14 +1300
From: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
To: pbonzini@...hat.com,
	seanjc@...gle.com,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com
Cc: isaku.yamahata@...el.com,
	reinette.chatre@...el.com,
	binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com,
	xiaoyao.li@...el.com,
	yan.y.zhao@...el.com,
	adrian.hunter@...el.com,
	tony.lindgren@...el.com,
	kristen@...ux.intel.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: VMX: Refactor VMX module init/exit functions

Add vt_init() and vt_exit() as the new module init/exit functions and
refactor existing vmx_init()/vmx_exit() as helper to make room for TDX
specific initialization and teardown.

To support TDX, KVM will need to enabling TDX during KVM module loading
time.  Enabling TDX requires enabling hardware virtualization first so
that all online CPUs (and the new CPU going online) are in post-VMXON
state.

Currently, the vmx_init() flow is:

 1) hv_init_evmcs(),
 2) kvm_x86_vendor_init(),
 3) Other VMX specific initialization,
 4) kvm_init()

The kvm_x86_vendor_init() invokes kvm_x86_init_ops::hardware_setup() to
do VMX specific hardware setup and calls kvm_update_ops() to initialize
kvm_x86_ops to VMX's version.

TDX will have its own version for most of kvm_x86_ops callbacks.  It
would be nice if kvm_x86_init_ops::hardware_setup() could also be used
for TDX, but in practice it cannot.  The reason is, as mentioned above,
TDX initialization requires hardware virtualization having been enabled,
which must happen after kvm_update_ops(), but hardware_setup() is done
before that.

Also, TDX is based on VMX, and it makes sense to only initialize TDX
after VMX has been initialized.  If VMX fails to initialize, TDX is
likely broken anyway.

So the new flow of KVM module init function will be:

 1) Current VMX initialization code in vmx_init() before kvm_init(),
 2) TDX initialization,
 3) kvm_init()

Split vmx_init() into two parts based above 1) and 3) so that TDX
initialization can fit in between.  Make part 1) as the new helper
vmx_init().  Introduce vt_init() as the new module init function which
calls vmx_init() and kvm_init().  TDX initialization will be added
later.

Do the same thing for vmx_exit()/vt_exit().

Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c  | 23 ++---------------------
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h  |  3 +++
 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c
index 7668e2fb8043..433ecbd90905 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c
@@ -166,3 +166,35 @@ struct kvm_x86_init_ops vt_init_ops __initdata = {
 	.runtime_ops = &vt_x86_ops,
 	.pmu_ops = &intel_pmu_ops,
 };
+
+static void vt_exit(void)
+{
+	kvm_exit();
+	vmx_exit();
+}
+module_exit(vt_exit);
+
+static int __init vt_init(void)
+{
+	int r;
+
+	r = vmx_init();
+	if (r)
+		return r;
+
+	/*
+	 * Common KVM initialization _must_ come last, after this, /dev/kvm is
+	 * exposed to userspace!
+	 */
+	r = kvm_init(sizeof(struct vcpu_vmx), __alignof__(struct vcpu_vmx),
+		     THIS_MODULE);
+	if (r)
+		goto err_kvm_init;
+
+	return 0;
+
+err_kvm_init:
+	vmx_exit();
+	return r;
+}
+module_init(vt_init);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index f6900bec4874..976fe6579f62 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -8587,23 +8587,16 @@ static void vmx_cleanup_l1d_flush(void)
 	l1tf_vmx_mitigation = VMENTER_L1D_FLUSH_AUTO;
 }

-static void __vmx_exit(void)
+void vmx_exit(void)
 {
 	allow_smaller_maxphyaddr = false;

 	vmx_cleanup_l1d_flush();
-}

-static void vmx_exit(void)
-{
-	kvm_exit();
-	__vmx_exit();
 	kvm_x86_vendor_exit();
-
 }
-module_exit(vmx_exit);

-static int __init vmx_init(void)
+int __init vmx_init(void)
 {
 	int r, cpu;

@@ -8647,21 +8640,9 @@ static int __init vmx_init(void)
 	if (!enable_ept)
 		allow_smaller_maxphyaddr = true;

-	/*
-	 * Common KVM initialization _must_ come last, after this, /dev/kvm is
-	 * exposed to userspace!
-	 */
-	r = kvm_init(sizeof(struct vcpu_vmx), __alignof__(struct vcpu_vmx),
-		     THIS_MODULE);
-	if (r)
-		goto err_kvm_init;
-
 	return 0;

-err_kvm_init:
-	__vmx_exit();
 err_l1d_flush:
 	kvm_x86_vendor_exit();
 	return r;
 }
-module_init(vmx_init);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
index 40303b43da6c..ad9efe41e691 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
@@ -755,4 +755,7 @@ static inline void vmx_segment_cache_clear(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
 	vmx->segment_cache.bitmask = 0;
 }

+int vmx_init(void);
+void vmx_exit(void);
+
 #endif /* __KVM_X86_VMX_H */
-- 
2.46.2