linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 00/12] MIPS: Support I6500 multi-cluster configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87cyjkbb4a.fsf@BLaptop.bootlin.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 14:39:01 +0100
From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>
To: Aleksandar Rikalo <arikalo@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, Chao-ying Fu
 <cfu@...ecomp.com>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, Geert
 Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Greg Ungerer <gerg@...nel.org>, Hauke
 Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>, Ilya Lipnitskiy <ilya.lipnitskiy@...il.com>,
 Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Paul Burton
 <paulburton@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Serge
 Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
 Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/12] MIPS: Support I6500 multi-cluster configuration

Hello Aleksandar,

> Hello Gregory,
>
> Thank you!
> Just to be clear, which patches can I put your "tested-by" on?

Good question ! :)

I've tested the entire series of patches together, rather than applying
each individual patch separately. Although I'm not entirely certain, my
best guess would be that you can safely put my 'tested-by' tag on each
one.

>
> I'm preparing series v8.

You could also include the other patches I sent on Friday in this
series, as suggested by Thomas.

Thanks,

Gregory

>
> --
> Aleksandar
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 5:07 PM Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Aleksandar,
>>
>>
>> I successfully tested it on an EyeQ6H SoC. On top of v6.12-rc4 I also
>> added only one patch needed for EyeQ6H:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241011-eyeq6h-smp-v2-1-8381edf8a5c6@bootlin.com/#t
>>
>> So for EyeQ6H, you can then add my
>> Tested-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>
>>
>> Then I also tested it on an EyeQ5, where the VP topology is
>> {2,2,2,2},{}. In this case there is no CPU core in the second
>> cluster. While some part of your series seems to support this case, it
>> was not complete. I am about to send a new patch for it
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gregory
>>