[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zx-zLHBseRoZz4MM@linux.dev>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 08:52:12 -0700
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
allen.lkml@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.11 000/261] 6.11.6-rc1 review
Hi,
Thanks for the report.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 09:14:57PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 at 12:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.11.6 release.
> > There are 261 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 30 Oct 2024 06:22:39 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.11.6-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.11.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
>
> The selftests: kvm: vgic_init test failed on stable-rc linux-6.11.y,
> also seen on Linux next-20241023 onwards and Linus v6.12-rc5
> on the Graviton4 and rk3399-rock-pi.
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>
> Test log:
> ---------
> # selftests: kvm: vgic_init
> # Random seed: 0x6b8b4567
> # Running GIC_v3 tests.
> # ==== Test Assertion Failure ====
> # lib/kvm_util.c:727: false
> # pid=2680 tid=2680 errno=5 - Input/output error
> # 1 0x0000000000404eaf: __vm_mem_region_delete at kvm_util.c:727
> (discriminator 5)
> # 2 0x0000000000405d0f: kvm_vm_free at kvm_util.c:765 (discriminator 12)
> # 3 0x0000000000402d5f: vm_gic_destroy at vgic_init.c:101
> # 4 (inlined by) test_vcpus_then_vgic at vgic_init.c:368
> # 5 (inlined by) run_tests at vgic_init.c:720
> # 6 0x0000000000401a6f: main at vgic_init.c:748
> # 7 0x0000ffff8620773f: ?? ??:0
> # 8 0x0000ffff86207817: ?? ??:0
> # 9 0x0000000000401b6f: _start at ??:?
> # KVM killed/bugged the VM, check the kernel log for clues
> not ok 9 selftests: kvm: vgic_init # exit=254
This is a known test issue currently being discussed [*], the KVM change
responsible for the test failure *is* correct.
[*] https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/3f0918bf-0265-4714-9660-89b75da49859@sirena.org.uk/
--
Thanks,
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists