linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] mmc: host: sdhci-esdhc-imx: implement emmc hardware reset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <DU0PR04MB9496769805197714F198EC0F904A2@DU0PR04MB9496.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 03:15:36 +0000
From: Bough Chen <haibo.chen@....com>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>, Josua Mayer <josua@...id-run.com>, Adrian
 Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Shawn
 Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix
 Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
CC: yazan.shhady <yazan.shhady@...id-run.com>, Rabeeh Khoury
	<rabeeh@...id-run.com>, "imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
	"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, dl-S32
	<S32@....com>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] mmc: host: sdhci-esdhc-imx: implement emmc hardware reset

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> Sent: 2024年10月28日 10:10
> To: Josua Mayer <josua@...id-run.com>; Adrian Hunter
> <adrian.hunter@...el.com>; Bough Chen <haibo.chen@....com>; Ulf Hansson
> <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>; Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>; Sascha Hauer
> <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>; Pengutronix Kernel Team
> <kernel@...gutronix.de>; Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
> Cc: yazan.shhady <yazan.shhady@...id-run.com>; Rabeeh Khoury
> <rabeeh@...id-run.com>; imx@...ts.linux.dev; linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org;
> dl-S32 <S32@....com>; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] mmc: host: sdhci-esdhc-imx: implement emmc hardware
> reset
> 
> > Subject: [PATCH] mmc: host: sdhci-esdhc-imx: implement emmc hardware
> > reset
> >
> > NXP ESDHC supports control of native emmc reset signal when pinmux is
> > set accordingly, using uSDHCx_SYS_CTRL register IPP_RST_N bit.
> > Documentation is available in NXP i.MX6Q Reference Manual.
> 
> But this relies on the PAD been configured as RESET, should this flow being
> default enabled whether the PAD is configured as RESET or not?

No, from my understanding, even the PAD is configured as RESET, still need SW to config IPP_RST_N to control the output of this pad.
Josua, you can double confirm this on your board. By the way, I check the code, when you do the test to support this reset operation on eMMC, did you add  "cap-mmc-hw-reset" in dts?
From current code logic, the callback you add here seems only can be called by eMMC device, so will be safe for sd and sdio device. And if your answer for my question is "yes", then your change will also be safe for eMMC device which do not use this reset function before.


> 
> >
> > Implement the hw_reset function in sdhci_ops asserting reset for at
> > least 10us and waiting an extra 300us after deassertion.
> > These particular delays were inspired by sunxi-mmc hw_reset function.
> >
> > Tested on SolidRun i.MX8DXL SoM with a scope, and confirmed that eMMC
> > is still accessible after boot. eMMC extcsd has RST_N_FUNCTION=0x01,
> > i.e.
> > reset input enabled, Linux v5.15.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer <josua@...id-run.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> > b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> > index
> > 8f0bc6dca2b0402fd2a0695903cf261a5b4e19dc..ebcfa427cca6cc2791
> > a1701a3515ef6515779aa4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> > @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
> >  #define ESDHC_SYS_CTRL_DTOCV_MASK	0x0f
> >  #define	ESDHC_CTRL_D3CD			0x08
> >  #define ESDHC_BURST_LEN_EN_INCR		(1 << 27)
> > +#define ESDHC_SYS_CTRL			0x2c
> > +#define ESDHC_SYS_CTRL_IPP_RST_N	BIT(23)
> >  /* VENDOR SPEC register */
> >  #define ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC		0xc0
> >  #define  ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC_SDIO_QUIRK	(1 << 1)
> > @@ -1402,6 +1404,15 @@ static u32 esdhc_cqhci_irq(struct sdhci_host
> > *host, u32 intmask)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +static void esdhc_hw_reset(struct sdhci_host *host) {
> > +	esdhc_clrset_le(host, ESDHC_SYS_CTRL_IPP_RST_N, 0,
> > ESDHC_SYS_CTRL);
> > +	udelay(10);
> > +	esdhc_clrset_le(host, ESDHC_SYS_CTRL_IPP_RST_N,
> > +			ESDHC_SYS_CTRL_IPP_RST_N,
> > ESDHC_SYS_CTRL);
> > +	udelay(300);
> 
> Please add a comment on why 10us or 300us? This is board related or soc
> related or card related?

Agree, please add comment and explain.

Regards
Haibo Chen
> 
> Thanks,
> Peng.
> 
> > +}
> > +
> >  static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_esdhc_ops = {
> >  	.read_l = esdhc_readl_le,
> >  	.read_w = esdhc_readw_le,
> > @@ -1420,6 +1431,7 @@ static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_esdhc_ops = {
> >  	.reset = esdhc_reset,
> >  	.irq = esdhc_cqhci_irq,
> >  	.dump_vendor_regs = esdhc_dump_debug_regs,
> > +	.hw_reset = esdhc_hw_reset,
> >  };
> >
> >  static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_esdhc_imx_pdata = {
> >
> > ---
> > base-commit: 9852d85ec9d492ebef56dc5f229416c925758edc
> > change-id: 20241027-imx-emmc-reset-7127d311174c
> >
> > Best regards,
> > --
> > Josua Mayer <josua@...id-run.com>
> >