[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<173013724023.126843.9607726471702748636.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 17:40:40 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+f2fs@...nel.org
To: Yi Sun <yi.sun@...soc.com>
Cc: chao@...nel.org, ke.wang@...soc.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sunyibuaa@...il.com, jaegeuk@...nel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, hao_hao.wang@...soc.com
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/2] Speed up f2fs truncate
Hello:
This series was applied to jaegeuk/f2fs.git (dev)
by Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 13:27:56 +0800 you wrote:
> Deleting large files is time-consuming, and a large part
> of the time is spent in f2fs_invalidate_blocks()
> ->down_write(sit_info->sentry_lock) and up_write().
>
> If some blocks are continuous and belong to the same segment,
> we can process these blocks at the same time. This can reduce
> the number of calls to the down_write() and the up_write(),
> thereby improving the overall speed of doing truncate.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [f2fs-dev,RFC,1/2] f2fs: introduce update_sit_entry_for_release()
https://git.kernel.org/jaegeuk/f2fs/c/af68d9b481ac
- [f2fs-dev,RFC,2/2] f2fs: introduce f2fs_invalidate_consecutive_blocks()
(no matching commit)
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists