[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87cyjk2kgg.ffs@tglx>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 18:42:07 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Steven Rostedt
<rostedt@...dmis.org>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, "Paul E .
McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnaldo
Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Namhyung Kim
<namhyung@...nel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michael Jeanson
<mjeanson@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend 6/8] tracing/ftrace: Add might_fault check to
syscall probes
On Mon, Sep 30 2024 at 15:23, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c b/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
> index a3d8ac00793e..0430890cbb42 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
> @@ -303,6 +303,7 @@ static void ftrace_syscall_enter(void *data, struct pt_regs *regs, long id)
> * Syscall probe called with preemption enabled, but the ring
> * buffer and per-cpu data require preemption to be disabled.
> */
> + might_fault();
> guard(preempt_notrace)();
I find it odd that the might_fault() check is in all the implementations
and not in the tracepoint itself:
if (syscall) {
might_fault();
rcu_read_unlock_trace();
} else ...
That's where I would have expected it to be.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists